Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03811119

Manta™ Versus Suture-based Closure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial

To investigate whether the collagen-based MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) is superior to suture-based VCDs in preventing vascular access site complications in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam

Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Netherlands

About this study

see summary

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing elective transfemoral TAVI for severe aortic valve stenosis with any commercially-available transcatheter heart valve (THV)
  • Common femoral artery diameter > 5.0mm (14 - 22F compatible)

Exclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic leg ischaemia
  • Previous thromboendarterectomy or plastic patch of the common femoral artery
  • Previous implantation of a suture-based VCD less than 30 days before, or a plug-based VCD within 6 months
  • Unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation
  • Systemic infection or a local infection at or near the access site
  • Allergy to the components any of both devices (i.e. bovine materials or any other device material, including collagen and/or collagen products, polyglycolic or polylactic acid, stainless steel or nickel)
  • Active bleeding or bleeding diathesis including thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/UL), thrombasthenia, hemophilia, or von Willebrand disease
  • Patients in whom continuous oral anticoagulation therapy cannot be stopped for the peri-procedural period or patients with INR >1.8 at the time of the procedure
  • Patient unable to be adequately anti-coagulated for the procedure
  • Morbidly obese or cachectic (BMI >40 kg/m2 or <20 kg/m2)
  • Anatomical and procedural contraindication for suture-based or Manta closure (lack of proper puncture site in the common femoral artery in terms of calcification, size, and atherosclerotic disease)
  • Absence of computed tomographic data of the access site before the procedure
  • Patient cannot adhere to or complete the investigational protocol for any reason including but not limited to geographical residence, psychiatric condition or life threatening disease
  • Known pregnancy at time of randomization (in women of childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory)
  • Participating in trials in which the primary endpoint includes bleeding or vascular complications

Treatment and study plan

MANTA Vascular Closure Device

Device

Collagen based vascular closure device

Suture based vascular closure device

Device

Suture based vascular closure device (ProGlide)

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite rate of major- and minor vascular complications according to VARC-2

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    The primary endpoint will consist of the composite of major- and minor vascular complications according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 at 30 days follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with a Major Vascular Complication according to VARC-2

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    total number of participants major vascular complications

  2. Number of Participants with a Minor Vascular Complication according to VARC-2

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    total number of participants minor vascular complications

  3. All-cause death rate

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    A distinction between cardiac-, non-cardiac vascular and non-cardiovascular death will be made

  4. Number of Participants with a major- or life threatening bleeding according to VARC-2

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    total number of participants with major/life-threatening bleedings

  5. Need for transfusions for access site related bleeding/complications

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    Total number of transfusions of RBC because of site-related bleeding

  6. Number of Participants with vascular closure device failure

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    Failure of a closure device to achieve haemostasis at the arteriotomy site leading to alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning)

  7. Time to hemostasis

    Time frame: During the TAVI procedure

    After the use of a vascular closure device the time to hemostasis will be classified as immediate hemostasis, hemostasis after 5 minutes manual compression, hemostasis after 10 minutes manual compression, hemostasis after endovascular ballooning, hemostasis after endovascular intervention or hemostasis after surgical intervention

  8. Total procedure time

    Time frame: During the TAVI procedure

    The total procedural time in minutes will be compared between the two treatment arms

  9. Number of Participants with a clinically relevant bleeding defined as BARC 2, 3 and 5

    Time frame: Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up

    Clinically relevant bleeding defined as BARC 2, 3 and 5

  10. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 30 days after the TAVI procedure

    The total length of hospital stay in days will be compared between the two treatment arms

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Acronym: MASH-TAVI

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jan 22, 2019
Registry last updated
Mar 29, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.