NCT Number: NCT00415220
Manipulation or Microdiscectomy For Sciatica? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
The purpose of this study was to compare standardized chiropractic treatment (spinal manipulation) to back surgery (microdiscectomy) for patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar herniated disc refractory to medical management.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary location
National Spine Care, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
About this study
Context: Operative management of lumbar radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients refractory to medical management provides rapid and effective symptom relief. However, both short and long term benefits of surgery continue to be scrutinized.
Objective: To compare clinical efficacy of Chiropractic Treatment against Microdiscectomy in patients suffering from sciatica secondary to LDH.
Study Design: Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial allowing crossover, recruitment 2000-2004, 1 year follow-up.
Setting: Elective primary care physician referrals made directly to neurosurgical spine surgeons at the Foothills Hospital and Medical Centre, University of Calgary.
Patients: Forty consecutive consenting patients with sciatica from LDH refractory to at least three months of non-operative care and found appropriate for surgery.
Interventions: Surgical microdiscectomy or standardized chiropractic treatment. Crossover to the alternate treatment allowed after 3 months.
Main Outcome Measures: McGill Pain Score, Roland Morris Disability Index, Aberdeen Pain Scale, and SF-36 General Health Survey before treatment initiation and after 3, 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Consecutive patients presenting through elective referral by primary care physicians to one of the three participating spinal neurosurgeons (SC, SJD, RJH) between December 2000 and May 2004 were screened for symptoms of unilateral lumbar radiculopathy secondary to LDH at L3/4, L4/5 or L5/S1. Detailed surgical histories and physical examinations were performed on each referred patient by the consulting neurosurgeon and correlated with evidence of appropriate root compression on MR imaging. Patients who had failed at least 3 months of non-operative management including treatment with analgesics, lifestyle modification, physiotherapy, massage therapy and / or acupuncture, and who were felt appropriate for microdiscectomy by the neurosurgeon were asked to consider study participation.
Exclusion criteria
- Radicular symptoms < 3 months duration
- Major neurological deficits such as:
- Cauda equina syndrome
- Rapidly progressing neurological symptoms (e.g. foot drop)
- Substance abuse
- Hospitalization for intravenous or intramuscular narcotics
- Systemic or visceral disease (e.g. auto-immune diseases, major system failure)
- Hemorrhagic disorders, anticoagulation therapy
- Previous surgery at symptomatic level
- Concurrent chiropractic care at time of enrollment
- Prolonged use of systemic corticosteroids
- Osteopenia/Osteoporosis
- Spondylolisthesis grade III or IV
- Unable to read or speak English
- Age < 18
- Pregnancy
- Dementia or other cognitive impairment
- Unavailable for follow-up (geographic barriers)
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
McGill Pain Score
-
Roland Morris Disability Index
-
Aberdeen Pain Scale
-
SF-36 General Health Survey
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
McMorland, Gordon, D.C.
Indiv
Collaborators
- Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER)
Registry information
Official study title
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Chiropractic and Back Surgery for the Treatment of Sciatica Secondary to Lumbar Herniated Disc: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2000
- Study completion
- 2004
- First posted
- Dec 22, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Dec 22, 2006
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
The Value of Traction in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT00942227
Bone Diseases, Hernia
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsTotal Lumbar Disc Prosthesis and Subsequent Work Activity at at Least Five Years After Total Lumbar Disc Replacement
NCT06989632
Bone Diseases, Hernia
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNon-surgical Spinal Decompression in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06275750
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
View Trial DetailsIntegrated Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management for Back Related Leg Pain
NCT05022121
Back Pain, Back Related Leg Pain
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details