Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07093853

Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Locator Attachments Versus Four-Implant Bar Attachments

This 10-year retrospective study investigates residual ridge changes in edentulous patients treated with mandibular overdentures (ODs) retained by either four Locator attachments or a four-implant bar system. Although two-implant ODs are well established, four-implant configurations may offer enhanced stability and function. Locator and bar attachments are commonly used, but their long-term effects on bone resorption patterns-especially posterior mandibular and anterior maxillary resorption-remain unclear. By standardizing implant positions, this study aims to directly compare the two systems to help guide clinicians in selecting the most effective attachment type for long-term success.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Faculty of Dentistry

Al Mansurah, Menoufia, Egypt

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Mohammed El-Sawy, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

00201061314522

About this study

Implant-supported mandibular overdentures (ODs) have become the preferred treatment for edentulous patients, particularly after the endorsement of this approach by the McGill and York consensus statements. Although the use of two implants is well established, emerging research supports the use of four implants to enhance denture stability, improve masticatory function, and better maintain the surrounding oral structures.

Among the available attachment systems, Locator and bar-retained attachments are the most frequently utilized, each offering specific benefits. Locator attachments are known for their simplicity, affordability, and ease of maintenance. In contrast, bar-retained systems provide more rigid splinting between implants and more even stress distribution. These systems differ biomechanically, especially regarding their impact on bone resorption in the posterior mandible, which plays a vital role in denture retention and function.

While some research has compared different attachment types, few studies have standardized implant number and position. Moreover, there is a lack of long-term comparative studies assessing four-implant mandibular ODs using both Locator and bar attachments. Critical outcomes such as posterior mandibular ridge resorption (PMandRR), marginal bone loss (MBL), and anterior maxillary ridge resorption (AMaxRR) must be examined to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and biomechanical performance of these attachment systems.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Completely edentulous mandible and maxilla for at least 12 months.
  • Four interforaminal dental implants placed in the lateral incisor and first premolar regions.
  • Opposing maxillary complete denture constructed using a muco-compressive impression technique, with maximum denture base extension and lingualized occlusion.
  • Mandibular bone height between 15-25 mm at the symphysis region as measured on panoramic radiograph.
  • Minimum 10-year follow-up with adequate radiographic documentation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism.
  • Parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism).
  • Smokers of more than 10 cigarettes/day or those with alcohol abuse.
  • Patients with implant failures, missing follow-up data, or implants placed outside the interforaminal region.

Treatment and study plan

Four Locator Attachments, Four Bar Attachment System

Other

This study retrospectively evaluated two types of implant-retained mandibular overdenture attachment systems placed in edentulous patients over a 10-year period. All patients received four dental implants placed in the interforaminal region (lateral incisor and first premolar areas).

In the Locator group, each implant was restored with an individual Locator attachment, allowing for independent retention and easier hygiene access.

In the Bar group, the four implants were splinted together with a rigid metal bar, and the overdenture was attached using clips that engaged the bar, offering splinted support and enhanced load distribution.

Both interventions were designed to support mandibular overdentures and were compared in terms of their long-term effects on posterior mandibular ridge resorption, marginal bone loss around implants, and anterior maxillary ridge resorption.

Primary outcomes

  1. Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)

    Time frame: 10 years

    Crestal bone loss around dental implants

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mohammed El-Sawy, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

00201061314522

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Menoufia University

Other

Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

Registry information

Official study title

Residual Ridge Changes in Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Locator Attachments Versus Four-Implant Bar Attachments: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.