Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan, 112
NCT Number: NCT02964299
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of mandibular advancement bite block to standard bite block for prevention of hypoxemia, intervention events and adverse effects during endoscopic examinations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Taipei, Taiwan, 112
During endoscopic examinations, especially upper gastrointestinal, bile duct, or bronchoscopic examinations, the endoscope need to be placed through the mouth. A bite block is used to protect vulnerable endoscope and protect patient's teeth. During sedative endoscopic exams, respiratory depression, apnea or upper airway obstruction will occur under the influence of the sedative medications. Serious adverse events may occur such as hypoxemia. A nasal airway, Larson's maneuver, jaw thrust or chin lift may be needed to open airways.
Mandibular advancement devices has been widely used in treating obstructive sleep apnea. A modified bite block that provides mandibular advancement could provide entry inlet of endoscope as well as provide mandibular advancement to provide patent airway during sedative endoscopy. In this study, we group the patients into test group using mandibular advancement bite block and a control group using standard bite block. After anesthetic induction, gastric endoscopy was performed. Degree of upper airway obstruction will be evaluated and recorded. Differences between the two groups will be evaluated.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mandibular advancement bite block that provides mandibular advancement by 3 mm, 6 mm, or 9 mm from neutral position
Time frame: up to 30 minutes
From start of sedation drug administration to end of endoscopic examination with the endoscope withdrawal from patient's mouth, peripheral oxygen saturation recorded. Area under curve of 95% oxygen desaturation is calculated by (95-saturation) x time.
Time frame: up to 30 minutes
From start of sedation drug administration to end of endoscopic examination with the endoscope withdrawal from patient's mouth, number of events such as chin lift, jaw thrust, insertion of nasal airway, or mask-bag ventilation recorded.
Time frame: up to 30 minutes
From start of sedation drug administration to end of endoscopic examination with the endoscope withdrawal from patient's mouth, number of events such as snoring, stridor, apnea, airway obstruction or loss of end tidal carbon dioxide waveform recorded.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Other Gov
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06227234
Airway Obstruction, Choking
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06742476
Airway Obstruction, Respiration Disorders
Al Fayyum, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06609499
Airway Obstruction, Respiration Disorders
Radom, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05748626
Airway Obstruction, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details