Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05431595

Managing Agitated Delirium With Neuroleptics and Anti-Epileptics as a Neuroleptic Sparing Strategy

To examine the effects of haloperidol, chlorpromazine, valproic acid and placebo, in conjunction with standardized non-pharmacologic interventions, in the first line treatment of agitated delirium in hospitalized patients with cancer. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to provide evidence on various therapeutic options for palliating delirium, thereby reducing delirium-related distress and ultimately alleviating suffering.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

David Hui, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

713-792-6258

David Hui, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Objectives:

Primary objective:

Compare the effect of scheduled haloperidol, chlorpromazine, valproate and placebo (non-pharmacological interventions alone) on the frequency of breakthrough restlessness over 72 hours in patients with agitated delirium seen by the palliative care consultation team. Our working hypothesis is that haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and valproate will lead to fewer episodes of breakthrough restlessness than placebo.

Secondary Objective #1:

Compare the effects of scheduled haloperidol, chlorpromazine, valproate and placebo on (1) RASS-PAL, (2) need for dose escalation, (3) perceived comfort by caregivers and bedside nurses, (4) delirium severity (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale), (5) delirium-related distress in caregivers and nurses (Delirium Experience Questionnaire), (6) delirium recall in patients (Delirium Recall Questionnaire), (7) symptom expression (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), (8) adverse effects, and (9) survival. Our working hypothesis is that haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and valproate are superior to placebo (non-pharmacologic interventions alone) in improving delirium-related outcomes.

Secondary Objective #2:

Estimate the efficacy of non-pharmacologic interventions alone on breakthrough restlessness. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the placebo group will require fewer breakthrough doses in the 72 hours after implementation of non-pharmacological interventions

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • [Patients] Diagnosis of advanced cancer (defined as locally advanced, metastatic recurrent, or incurable disease)
  • [Patients] Seen by palliative care inpatient consultation team
  • [Patients] Delirium as per DSM-5 criteria
  • [Patients] Hyperactive or mixed delirium with either a rescue medication order or any non-pharmacologic measures (e.g. sitter, restraints) for agitation, restlessness, or delirium
  • [Patients] Age 18 years or older
  • [Patients] Permission from clinician from primary team to enroll
  • [Family Caregivers] Patient's spouse, adult child, sibling, parent, other relative, or significant other (defined by the patient as a partner)
  • [Family Caregivers] Age 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

  • [Patients] On scheduled haloperidol >4 mg/d, chlorpromazine >100 mg/d, or valproate >750 mg/d
  • [Patients] History of myasthenia gravis, acute narrow-angle glaucoma, or hepatic encephalopathy as documented in chart
  • [Patients] Hepatic dysfunction (unresolved AST or ALT >2.5x ULN, bilirubin >1.5x ULN or INR >1.5 within past month)
  • [Patients] History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome as documented in chart
  • [Patients] Active seizure disorder within past month as documented in chart
  • [Patients] History of Parkinson's disease or dementia as documented in chart
  • [Patients] History of prolonged QTc interval (>500 ms) if documented by most recent ECG within the past month
  • [Patients] Hypersensitivity to haloperidol, chlorpromazine, or valproate as documented in chart
  • [Patients] Pancreatitis within past month as documented in chart
  • [Patients] Currently on lamotrigine, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine
  • [Patients] Physical signs of impending death such as respiration with mandibular movement and death rattle
  • [Patients] Pregnancy as documented in chart
  • [Patients] Active COVID-19 infection as documented in chart

Treatment and study plan

Haloperidol

Drug

Given by Vein (IV)

Chlorpromazine

Drug

Given by Vein (IV)

Other names: Chlorpromazine hydrochloride, Thorazine®

Valproate

Drug

Given by Vein (IV)

Other names: Depakene, Valproate Acid

Placebo

Drug

Given by Vein (IV)

Primary outcomes

  1. Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Questionnaire

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)-score scale ranges from (0-10) No pain-0/Worse Possible Pain 10 (0-10)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

David Hui, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(713) 792-6258

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 24, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.