CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07389681
This is a single-center prospective observational study comparing two techniques for reconstructing bone loss in the lower limbs. The aim of the study was to compare the results of reconstructions using the Masquelet technique with reconstructions using electromagnetic transport nails. The primary endpoint was time to bone healing. This study is the first prospective descriptive study of electromagnetic transport nails.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Segmental bone defects pose a major challenge in orthopaedics due to various causes like trauma, oncology resections, or chronic osteomyelitis. Reconstruction techniques are complex, with Masquelet's method being the most widely used in France, despite mixed outcomes and complications. A novel electromagnetic bone transport technique via intramedullary nailing has emerged as a promising alternative. The primary goal of the study is to compare consolidation times between these two approaches for metaphyseal-diaphyseal bone loss in the lower limbs. Secondary objectives include assessing patient demographics, functional outcomes, quality of life, hospital stays, and adverse events.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Exhaustive collection of data in a health data warehouse: collection of clinical, radiological examinations (standard of care), functionals scores and self- administered questionnaire (quality of life).
Time frame: From enrollment to 36 months after
Radiological consolidation is defined by an anteroposterior and lateral radiograph showing at least three out of four cortical plates consolidated. This assessment is performed during follow-up by the physician treating the patient and will be confirmed by an evaluation committee at a later stage.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional recovery assessed using MSTS (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score). It is composed of 6 items , each item on a scale of 0 to 5, with a higher score indicating better function. The total score, ranging from 0 (maximum disability) to 30 (no disability), can be converted to a point scale from 0 to 100.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time from initial reconstructive surgery to full weight-bearing without assistive devices, as assessed during routine clinical follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional recovery assessed using Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). It is composed of 20 items , each item on a scale of 0 to 4, with a higher score indicating better function and total score from 0 to 80.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional recovery assessed using Paley-Maar score. This score is defined from "excellent" to "poor"in fonction of pain, autonomous, ....
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Health-related quality of life evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire. This questionnaire is composed of 11 items and total score from 0 to 100.
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Occurrence and type of adverse events and complications, including infections, mechanical failures, nonunion, and need for revision surgery.
Time frame: From enrollment to 36 months after
Proportion of patients achieving radiological bone consolidation, defined as healing of at least 3 of 4 cortices on standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Benjamin BOUYER, PROF
CONTACT
Romain HUGUET
CONTACT
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Other
Evaluation of the Management of Bone Loss in Orthopaedic Surgery Using the Masquelet Technique or Transport Nails
Acronym: EPSOCOT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.