Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05955560

Male External Catheters' Comparison of Comfort and Efficacy

A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover, Single-blind, Single Center Healthy Volunteer Study conducted over 1 day, with 2 voids using the PureWick (PW) Male external catheter (MEC) vs. comparator Sage PrimoFit™. This study is designed to assess the performance, comfort, and ease of use of the PW Male external catheter as compared to the comparator product.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

USF Health Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation (CAMLS)

Tampa, Florida, 336020, United States

About this study

In this prospective, post-market, crossover, single-blind, single center healthy volunteer study, healthy males will be randomized 1:1 to a treatment sequence using two devices (PureWick™ Male External Catheter and Sage PrimoFit™) and followed for 1 day through 2 voids. Approximately 50 participants will be enrolled in this study to obtain 44 evaluable subjects. This study is designed to assess the performance, comfort, and ease of use of the PW Male external catheter.

The purpose of this study is to provide clinical evidence to compare the effectiveness and comfort of PureWick™ Male against a comparator for non-invasive urine output management in patients with varying male anatomy. Specifically, the study will collect data about how the male external catheters perform when participants are positioned on their side using a turning wedge with the head of the bed elevated, mimicking common patient positioning in the hospital setting.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult Male Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Male anatomy at time of enrollment
  • Ability to speak and understand English
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures in this protocol
  • Able to independently void urine
  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Urinary incontinence which does not allow the subject to spontaneously void
  • Frequent episodes of bowel incontinence
  • Has Urinary Retention
  • Has any irritation, wound, open lesion, at the application site, on the genitalia, perineum, or sacrum
  • Recent surgery of the external urogenital tract, penis, or pubic area
  • Not able to comply with study procedures independently without required assistance
  • Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude them from participating in the study

Treatment and study plan

PureWick Male External Catheter

Device

The PureWick™ Male External Catheter (MEC) is intended for non-invasive urine output management in male patients. It is a single-use, non-sterile device. The PureWick™ Male External Catheter is a commercially available device which is Class I, 510(K) exempt.

Other names: PureWick MEC

Sage PrimoFit

Device

The PrimoFit External Urine Management for the Male Anatomy is indicated for the non-invasive external collection of urine for adult patients with male anatomy who require urine management. It is a single-use, non-sterile device. The Sage PrimoFit is a commercially available device which is Class I, 510(K) exempt.

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance of the PureWick MEC Against an Established Comparator

    Time frame: Approximately 2 hours after device placement

    Capture rate following void (captured as % of urine captured by device and collected in canister, measured by weight).

    Prior to each void, the weight of the empty urine collection canister and the weight of a dry absorbent pad are collected. Participants void into the device while laying in a bed with the absorbent pad underneath them. After each void, the post-void weight of the urine collection canister and the post-void weight of the absorbent pad are collected.

    Capture rate is calculated as the weight of captured urine (post-void canister weight - pre-void canister weight) / total urine volume (captured urine (post-void canister weight - pre-void canister weight) + leaked urine (post-void pad weight - pre-void pad weight)) * 100.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance of the PureWick MEC in Morbidly Obese Subpopulation

    Time frame: Approximately 2 hours after device placement

    Capture rate following void (captured as % of urine captured by device and collected in canister, measured by weight).

  2. Participant Comfort

    Time frame: Approximately 2 hours after device placement

    Overall comfort on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1- 5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Uncomfortable, 2 = Uncomfortable, 3 = Neither Comfortable or Uncomfortable, 4 = Comfortable, and 5 = Very Comfortable.

    The last survey question related to likelihood to recommend the device ranged from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Unlikely, 2 = Unlikely, 3 = Neither Likely Nor Unlikely, 4 - Likely, and 5 = Very Likely.

  3. Participant Comfort Scale Survey

    Time frame: Approximately 2 hours after device placement

    Overall comfort on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1- 5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Uncomfortable, 2 = Uncomfortable, 3 = Neither Comfortable or Uncomfortable, 4 = Comfortable, and 5 = Very Comfortable.

    The last survey question related to likelihood to recommend the device ranged from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Unlikely, 2 = Unlikely, 3 = Neither Likely Nor Unlikely, 4 - Likely, and 5 = Very Likely.

  4. Ease of Use by Health Care Professional (HCP)

    Time frame: Approximately 2 hours after device placement

    Ease of use score on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1- 5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Difficult, 2 = Somewhat Difficult, 3 = Average Difficulty, 4 = Somewhat Easy, and 5 = Very Easy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

C. R. Bard

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Efficacy and Comfort of the PureWick Male External Catheter Against a Comparator in Healthy Volunteers

Acronym: MECCE

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jul 21, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.