Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05986149

Making Intergenerational Connections Through Arts

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact on older adults' wellbeing of participating in a 10-week conversation about arts and culture with an international university student whose native language is not English.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Hon K Yuen, PhD

CONTACT

Hon K Yuen, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Older adults residing in subsidized housing will participate in a series of online conversations over 10 weeks about various arts and culture with an international university student enrolled at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB); each weekly session will last for about 30 min to one hour.

Participants will complete survey questionnaires before and after the 10-week conversation program, and an exit interview at the end of the conversation program.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Live alone
  • older than 60 years old
  • Residence in a subsidized apartment for at least one year
  • Able to carry on a daily conversation with or without hearing aids
  • Intact cognition as indicated by a score of greater than 5 on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)
  • have a working smart phone that can do video-conferencing
  • being able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • having physical, or sensory (visual or hearing) deficits or language barriers (non-English communicators) that may impede study participation
  • non-English speaker

Treatment and study plan

Conversation about arts and culture

Behavioral

intergenerational conversation about arts and culture between older adults and international students who native language is not English.

Primary outcomes

  1. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: baseline

    (ULS-8, Hays & Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.

  2. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    (ULS-8, Hays & Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.

  3. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: at 2 months

    (ULS-8, Hays & Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.

  4. De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: baseline

    De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.

  5. De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.

  6. De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: at 2 months

    De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.

  7. Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)

    Time frame: baseline

    It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.

  8. Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.

  9. Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)

    Time frame: at 2 months

    It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.

  10. Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)

    Time frame: baseline

    It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.

  11. Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.

  12. Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)

    Time frame: at 2 months

    It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: baseline

    SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.

  2. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.

  3. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    Time frame: at 2 months

    SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.

  4. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

    Time frame: baseline

    The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.

  5. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.

  6. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

    Time frame: at 2 months

    The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.

  7. Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: baseline

    is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.

  8. Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: at 10 weeks

    is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.

  9. Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: at 2 months

    is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hon K Yuen, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

2059346301

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.