Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03340363

"Make It Fresh, For Less" Supermarket Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of environmental modifications (choice architecture and a marketing campaign) in combination with weekly text messages on purchases of foods made by parents shopping in a large supermarket.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Food Habits Behavior Behavior, Animal Consumer Behavior Feeding Behavior

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

The "Make It Fresh, For Less" Supermarket Pilot Study is a supermarket-based intervention developed by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in collaboration with the nonprofit organization ChopChop Magazine (chopchopmagazine.org) and a large Northeastern supermarket chain. A promotional campaign advertising low-cost, kid-friendly meals was piloted in one store selected by the supermarket partner, with promotions rotating every 4 weeks during a 16-week intervention period. Parent shoppers were recruited (n=401) at the store and given a study loyalty card to track their transactions. At the start of the intervention, half of the participants were additionally randomized to receive weekly behavioral messages via text message or email. Supermarket purchases were assessed at baseline, during the 16-week intervention, and up to 6-weeks post-intervention.

Primary Aim 1: to examine the impact of a choice architecture intervention in combination with a promotional campaign on food purchases of parents shopping in a large supermarket. It is hypothesized that there will be an increase in selection of foods targeted by the promotional campaign when physical modifications are made.

Primary Aim 2: to examine the impact of weekly behavioral messages in combination with an environmental change intervention on food purchases of parents shopping in a large supermarket. It is hypothesized that there will be a greater increase in selection of foods targeted by the promotional campaign among participants receiving the messages compared to participants exposed to the environmental change intervention alone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • English-speaking
  • Live with a child 18 years of age or younger
  • Do more than 50% of shopping at the study store
  • Primary shopper in the household

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

environmental change

Behavioral
  • Offer kid-friendly, low-cost recipes in a prominent, high-traffic location.
  • Offer healthy default ingredients (bundled ingredients promoted with recipes).
  • Promote recipe ingredients with prominently displayed signage and images.
  • Promote recipes in multiple locations throughout the store.

Other names: choice architecture, promotional campaign

Messaging

Behavioral

Short, behavioral messages sent to participants via text message or email each week to promote the in-store environmental changes

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in weekly purchases of recipe components (Selection of items bundled with each recipe) during four, 4-week promotional campaigns

    Time frame: Baseline, during intervention (4 weeks each) and up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Purchase of recipe ingredients

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in weekly purchases of other food categories (substitution of recipe ingredients for other foods)

    Time frame: Baseline, during intervention (4 weeks each) and up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Substitution of recipe ingredients for other foods

  2. Differential change in weekly purchases of recipe components by SNAP-eligibility

    Time frame: Baseline, during intervention (4 weeks each) and up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Stratification by SNAP-eligibility, recipe components

  3. Differential change in weekly purchases of other food groups (substitution) by SNAP-eligibility

    Time frame: Baseline, during intervention (4 weeks each) and up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Stratification by SNAP-eligibility, other food groups

  4. Acceptability of intervention (self-reported survey measures)

    Time frame: Up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Shopper responses to survey questions asking participants to rate the acceptability of each recipe (taste, cost, difficulty, perceptions of children's preferences) on a Likert scale from 1-5.

  5. Recall of intervention (self-reported survey measures)

    Time frame: Up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Shopper responses to survey questions regarding aided and unaided recall. Unaided recall asks shoppers to choose the best description of what they saw in the store and aided recall asks shoppers whether they remember seeing various elements of the display in the store (yes, no, not sure). These measures will be combined to report the proportion of shoppers who recalled each component of the intervention either through aided or unaided means.

  6. Adoption of intervention (self-reported survey measures)

    Time frame: Up to 6 weeks post-intervention

    Shopper responses to survey questions asking whether the shopper made each recipe in the display.

  7. Reach of intervention (direct observation measures)

    Time frame: During intervention (4 weeks each)

    Observation of shopper interactions with promotional campaign (count of number of shoppers who passed the display, looked at the display, and took an item from the display).

  8. Fidelity to intended intervention (direct observation measures)

    Time frame: During intervention (4 weeks each)

    Monthly random site visits to assess presence or absence of each element of the display (placards, poster, recipe cards, intended ingredients, store banners).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

Other

Collaborators

  • Duke University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of New England

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 13, 2017
Registry last updated
Nov 13, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.