Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07364721

Maitland Mobilization vs. McKenzie Press-Up in Chronic LBP

ABSTRACT Objective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of central posteroanterior (PA) Maitland mobilization with myofascial release (MFR) and McKenzie prone press-up (PPU) exercise with MFR in the treatment of adult patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Materials and Methods:A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Salhab Center and Al Shifa's Specialized Complex in Bethlehem between January 2023 and May 2024. The study included 50 adult patients (aged 18-50) with CNLBP of more than 3 months but less than 2 years' duration, referred by an orthopedic specialist at Beit Sahour Medical Center. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one received central PA Maitland mobilization with MFR, and the other received McKenzie PPU exercise with MFR. Pain intensity, functional impairment, and fear-avoidance beliefs were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Each patient underwent three sessions per week for four weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Palestine Ahliya University

Bethlehem, West Bank, P150, Palestinian Territories

About this study

This randomized controlled trial evaluated physiotherapy interventions in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). The study was conducted at Salhab Center for Physiotherapy and Al Shifa's Specialized Complex in Bethlehem City between December 2023 and May 2024. These centers were selected for their accessibility and coordinated referral system.

Participants were referred from orthopedic assessment to physiotherapy, where baseline evaluations were completed prior to randomization. Random allocation to intervention groups was performed using a concealed allocation method.

Physiotherapy interventions were delivered by licensed physiotherapists according to standardized treatment protocols to ensure consistency. Treatment sessions consisted of structured therapeutic exercises and manual therapy techniques, with progression individualized based on patient response. Outcome data were collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention period using validated assessment tools. Participant adherence and adverse events were monitored throughout the study. All procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical standards, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 and 50 years of age,
  • Male or female, with NSLBP localized between the lower rib and the gluteal fold
  • Persisting for more than three months and occurring on at least half of the days in the past three months, with pain affecting daily functional activities.
  • VAS score between 40 mm and 80 mm at the initial assessment
  • No use of NSAID medications during treatment sessions.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients younger than 18 or older than 50 years,
  • Those with mental health disorders, systemic or neurological diseases, or specific spinal pathologies such as facet joint dysfunction, piriformis syndrome, disc herniation, spinal tumors, spondylitis, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, or spinal osteoporosis. Patients were also excluded if they had contraindications to mobilization, a history of spinal surgery or epidural injections, physiotherapy for LBP within the last six months, a VAS score outside the 40-80 mm range, pregnancy, or a current upper limb injury.

Treatment and study plan

Group B (McKenzie PPU exercise with MFR)

Other

Patient position: The patient assumes a prone position. Therapist position: The therapist stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction.

Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range.

Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes

Central Posteroanterior Mobilization

Other

According to Maitland's concept, mobilization technique including passive accessory intervertebral movement was applied to cause movement in the stiff vertebral segment without the active involvement of the muscles [44]. Central PA mobilization technique is a cornerstone of Maitland vertebral mobilization [38]. It can be achieved by passive force onto a vertebral segment in the PA direction [44].

Patient position: When applying this technique, the patient assumes a relaxed and comfortable prone position, with the arms positioned alongside the body [23, 24].

investigator position: The investigator stands close to the patient, with their sternum perpendicular to the selected lumbar spinous process [23]. The investigator uses the ulnar surface of the hand (pisiform) over the selected spinous process in the lumbar spine, another hand taken was placed above the first hand to reinforce, and the elbow should slightly bent with forearm in neutral between supination & pronation.

McKenzie PPU exercise with MFR

Other

Patient position: The patient assumes a prone position. investigator position: The investigator stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction.

Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range.

Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes

Primary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index

    Time frame: 4 WEEKS

    0% (no disability) to 100% (severe disability)

Other outcomes

  1. Visual Analogu Scale

    Time frame: 4 WEEKS

    0 no pain , 10 severe pain

  2. Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire

    Time frame: 4 WEEKS

    The Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) scoring involves summing responses to 16 items on a 0-6 Likert scale (0=completely disagree, 6=completely agree

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Palestine Ahliya University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization vs. McKenzie Press-Up in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial

Acronym: LBP

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.