Palestine Ahliya University
Bethlehem, West Bank, P150, Palestinian Territories
NCT Number: NCT07364721
ABSTRACT Objective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of central posteroanterior (PA) Maitland mobilization with myofascial release (MFR) and McKenzie prone press-up (PPU) exercise with MFR in the treatment of adult patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Materials and Methods:A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Salhab Center and Al Shifa's Specialized Complex in Bethlehem between January 2023 and May 2024. The study included 50 adult patients (aged 18-50) with CNLBP of more than 3 months but less than 2 years' duration, referred by an orthopedic specialist at Beit Sahour Medical Center. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one received central PA Maitland mobilization with MFR, and the other received McKenzie PPU exercise with MFR. Pain intensity, functional impairment, and fear-avoidance beliefs were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Each patient underwent three sessions per week for four weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bethlehem, West Bank, P150, Palestinian Territories
This randomized controlled trial evaluated physiotherapy interventions in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). The study was conducted at Salhab Center for Physiotherapy and Al Shifa's Specialized Complex in Bethlehem City between December 2023 and May 2024. These centers were selected for their accessibility and coordinated referral system.
Participants were referred from orthopedic assessment to physiotherapy, where baseline evaluations were completed prior to randomization. Random allocation to intervention groups was performed using a concealed allocation method.
Physiotherapy interventions were delivered by licensed physiotherapists according to standardized treatment protocols to ensure consistency. Treatment sessions consisted of structured therapeutic exercises and manual therapy techniques, with progression individualized based on patient response. Outcome data were collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention period using validated assessment tools. Participant adherence and adverse events were monitored throughout the study. All procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical standards, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient position: The patient assumes a prone position. Therapist position: The therapist stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction.
Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range.
Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes
According to Maitland's concept, mobilization technique including passive accessory intervertebral movement was applied to cause movement in the stiff vertebral segment without the active involvement of the muscles [44]. Central PA mobilization technique is a cornerstone of Maitland vertebral mobilization [38]. It can be achieved by passive force onto a vertebral segment in the PA direction [44].
Patient position: When applying this technique, the patient assumes a relaxed and comfortable prone position, with the arms positioned alongside the body [23, 24].
investigator position: The investigator stands close to the patient, with their sternum perpendicular to the selected lumbar spinous process [23]. The investigator uses the ulnar surface of the hand (pisiform) over the selected spinous process in the lumbar spine, another hand taken was placed above the first hand to reinforce, and the elbow should slightly bent with forearm in neutral between supination & pronation.
Patient position: The patient assumes a prone position. investigator position: The investigator stands beside the patient and provides verbal instruction.
Direction: Patients were being instructed to perform PPU exercise by using their upper limbs to push their upper body up into spinal extension while the pelvis remained on the treatment table. The patient is trained to extend the lumbar spine to the maximum pain-free range.
Frequency: Ten repetitions for three sets with a 30-second break between each set for almost 10 minutes
Time frame: 4 WEEKS
0% (no disability) to 100% (severe disability)
Time frame: 4 WEEKS
0 no pain , 10 severe pain
Time frame: 4 WEEKS
The Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) scoring involves summing responses to 16 items on a 0-6 Likert scale (0=completely disagree, 6=completely agree
Palestine Ahliya University
Other
Comparative Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization vs. McKenzie Press-Up in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial
Acronym: LBP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07405112
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), Back Pain
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06762106
Back Pain, Back Pain Lower Back
Minya, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06668129
Back Pain, Back Pain Lower Back
Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00741650
Back Pain, Back Pain Lower Back
Stavern, Norway
View Trial Details