NDDC BRU and Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT01572064
The main purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in the detection and grading of liver fibrosis, so that the investigators can reduce the need of invasive techniques such as liver biopsy and transjugular hepatic venous portal pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements to assess the degree of liver scarring and portal hypertension.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
In chronic liver diseases of all aetiology, persistent hepatocyte injury leads to progressive fibrosis and cirrhosis. In the UK, 76 adults per 100,000 population have cirrhosis and its incidence is increasing (Fleming et al., J Hepatol 2008,49,p732-738). Currently, liver biopsy is the only method of assessing the degree of fibrosis. However, liver biopsy is associated with limitations such as sampling error, intra- and inter-observer variations in interpretation and adverse events (Morbidity 1-5% and mortality between 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000), hence considered a 'Silver (rather than Gold) standard'. Assessment of degree of fibrosis is necessary to stage the disease process, determine the timing of intervention and for prognosis.
Development of portal hypertension as a result of progressive fibrosis is a landmark in the natural history of chronic liver diseases as it accounts for majority of complications and clinical outcome. The degree of fibrosis and presence of portal hypertension will determine whether patients are included in surveillance programmes for the early detection of varices and hepatocellular carcinoma. As with assessment of the degree of fibrosis, the presence and degree of portal hypertension can only be determined by transjugular hepatic venous portal pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements, another investigation that is also hampered by access, costs, risks and difficulty of serial measurements.
A variety of evolving techniques using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Talwalkar et al., Hepatology 2008; 47:332-42) if validated and established, have potential to replace liver biopsy and HVPG measurements. The non-invasive nature of MRI, its ability to estimate amount of accumulated fat (1H MR spectroscopy), cell membrane turnover (31P-MRS), iron (relaxometry), fibrosis (MR elastography) as well as an ability to assess portal blood flow and hepatic perfusion (Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL)) make it an ideal tool to evaluate liver structure and function and to stage the liver disease. Most recently, MRI has seen unprecedented developments in terms of accuracy of quantitation and speed of assessment, which has been realised due to data-sharing ultra-fast MRI sequences, multispectral analysis, and refinement of elastography methods. Validation of evolving MRI techniques against liver biopsies, HVPG and metabolomics is a critical step prior to its translation into clinical applications by the creation of MRI biomarkers.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 fasted blood sample taken for metabolomics
1 single visit for MRI and MRS
Time frame: MRI within 3 months of liver biopsy
MRI and MRS
Time frame: Blood Test taken on same day as MRI
Metabolomics analysis
University of Nottingham
Other
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis: Search for MRI Biomarker
Acronym: Mrker
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07069725
Digestive System Diseases, Fibrosis
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT05935488
Digestive System Diseases, Fibrosis
Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06750276
Digestive System Diseases, Fibrosis
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00326482
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details