Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00707876

Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)

The purpose of this study is to compare the difference between two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for visualizing arteries. The study hypothesizes that one method that relies upon imaging flowing blood in the pelvic and leg arteries will not be as accurate or efficient as injecting a safe imaging agent to change the appearance of the blood on the MRI. Both methods will be compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Lexington, Massachusetts, 02421, United States

About this study

This was a Phase 2, open-label, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single administration of intravenous (IV) ferumoxytol at 3 dose levels as a VE-MRI imaging agent to facilitate detection of arterial stenosis in subjects with PAD. Eligible subjects were already scheduled for DSA to be completed within 14 days of the MR assessments. Nineteen sites randomized subjects in the study. The sites were selected such that an equal number of subjects could be scanned on the 3 major MRI 1.5 T platforms (Siemens, General Electric, and Philips).

Subjects were stratified by imaging platform and randomized to receive 1.0, 2.5, or 4.0 mg/kg IV ferumoxytol. On the same study day, subjects first underwent a noncontrast MRA, followed by administration of the randomized ferumoxytol dose and VE-MRI. Within 2 weeks subjects then underwent the previously scheduled DSA of the aortoiliac and superficial femoral arteries that served as the reference "gold standard."

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with symptoms of PAD
  • Scheduled for DSA

Exclusion criteria

  • Critical leg ischemia manifested by ulcers, gangrene or leg amputation
  • Laboratory evidence of iron overload, liver disease, pregnancy
  • History of allergy to or recent exposure to radiocontrast, gadolinium chelates, or intravenous iron therapy
  • Clinical concerns about co-morbidities, subject suitability

Treatment and study plan

ferumoxytol

Drug

1.0 mg/kg IV ferumoxytol

Primary outcomes

  1. Segment-level Sensitivity and Specificity of VE-MRI at 3 Ferumoxytol Dosing Levels and Differences in Sensitivity and Specificity by Dose Group

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of VE-MRI by dose group was performed on the ITD segments by 3 Readers. The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

  2. Segment-level Sensitivity and Specificity of Noncontrast MRA at 3 Ferumoxytol Dosing Levels and Difference From Sensitivity by Dose Group

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of noncontrast MRA by dose group was performed on the ITD segments by 3 Readers. The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Segment-level Positive and Negative Predictive Values of VE-MRI Using Ferumoxytol at 3 Dosing Levels

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    The sensitivity and specificity estimated by imaging platforms and dose group by imaging platforms will be reported and statistical tests of whether sensitivity/specificity differs by imaging platforms will be done. The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

  2. Segment-level Positive and Negative Predictive Values of Noncontrast MRA

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    The sensitivity and specificity estimated by imaging platforms and dose group by imaging platforms will be reported and statistical tests of whether sensitivity/specificity differs by imaging platforms will be done. The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

  3. Segment-level Total Percent, Positive Percent Between VE-MRI and Noncontrast MRA

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

  4. Segment Level Sensitivity and Specificity of VE-MRI by Dosing Within Platforms and Independent Readers

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

  5. Segment-level Negative Percent Agreements VE-MRI and Noncontrast MRA

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

  6. Segment-level Total Percent, Kappa Statistics Between VE-MRI and Noncontrast MRA

    Time frame: 3 weeks

    The per reader comparison of VE-MRI sensitivity and noncontrast MRA sensitivity will take into account that readings are correlated because each subject (and segments) undergo both VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA scans. The differences between ferumoxytol dose groups for the difference between VE-MRI and noncontrast MRA will be reported. The data were pooled across all imaging platforms.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Phase II, Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial Comparing Noncontrast MRA vs. Ferumoxytol Vascular Enhanced MRI for Detection of Stenosis or Occlusion of the Aortoiliac and Superficial Femoral Arteries in PAD Subjects Scheduled for DSA

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jul 1, 2008
Registry last updated
Apr 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.