University of Mosul/ College of Dentistry
Mosul, +964, Iraq
NCT Number: NCT07424820
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the magnetic mallet technique improves primary implant stability and clinical outcomes compared with conventional drilling during dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla with soft bone quality.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the magnetic mallet technique result in higher primary implant stability compared with conventional drilling?
Does the magnetic mallet technique reduce surgical trauma and related complications compared with conventional drilling?
Researchers will compare the magnetic mallet technique with conventional drilling to determine differences in implant stability, bone response, and clinical outcomes.
Participants will:
Undergo dental implant placement using either the magnetic mallet technique or conventional drilling.
Be clinically and radiographically evaluated for implant stability and postoperative outcomes during follow-up
Interested in participating?
Request Info20 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mosul, +964, Iraq
This study is a prospective clinical trial designed to compare the magnetic mallet technique with conventional drilling for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla characterized by soft bone quality (D4 bone). Achieving adequate primary implant stability in this region remains a clinical challenge, and techniques that preserve and condense bone may improve treatment outcomes.
The magnetic mallet technique uses controlled electromagnetic impulses to prepare the implant site through bone condensation rather than bone removal, potentially enhancing primary stability and reducing surgical trauma. In contrast, conventional drilling relies on rotational cutting instruments that remove bone and may generate heat, which can negatively affect bone vitality.
Eligible participants requiring dental implants in the posterior maxillary region will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: implant site preparation using the magnetic mallet technique or conventional drilling. All implants will be placed following standardized surgical protocols.
Primary outcomes will include the assessment of primary implant stability using objective measurement methods. Secondary outcomes will evaluate peri-implant bone response, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and overall clinical performance during follow-up.
The results of this study aim to provide clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of the magnetic mallet technique compared with conventional drilling, particularly in soft posterior maxillary bone, to support evidence-based decision-making in implant dentistry
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
where: patients with
Exclusion criteria
where: patients with Systemic diseases affecting bone healing, active oral infection, smoking habits, or a need for bone augmentation procedures were excluded.
implant site preparation using sequential rotary drills according to standard protocol.
Implant site preparation using controlled electromagnetic impulses for bone condensation.
Time frame: immediately after implant placement and at 3 months postoperatively
Implant stability was assessed using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values , ISQ > 70: High stability. ISQ 60-69: Moderate stability. ISQ < 60: Low stability.
Time frame: 7 days after surgery
Postoperative pain was assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
University of Mosul
Other
Clinical Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Mallet and Conventional Drilling Techniques for Implant Placement in D4 Bone: A Prospective Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07090694
Alveolar Bone Loss, Atrophy
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT07665281
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Hillah, Babylon, Iraq
View Trial DetailsNCT07521514
Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Giza, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07047131
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial Details