Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT07424820

Magnetic Mallet Vs Conventional Drilling in D4 Posterior Maxilla

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the magnetic mallet technique improves primary implant stability and clinical outcomes compared with conventional drilling during dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla with soft bone quality.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the magnetic mallet technique result in higher primary implant stability compared with conventional drilling?

Does the magnetic mallet technique reduce surgical trauma and related complications compared with conventional drilling?

Researchers will compare the magnetic mallet technique with conventional drilling to determine differences in implant stability, bone response, and clinical outcomes.

Participants will:

Undergo dental implant placement using either the magnetic mallet technique or conventional drilling.

Be clinically and radiographically evaluated for implant stability and postoperative outcomes during follow-up

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

20 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Mosul/ College of Dentistry

Mosul, +964, Iraq

About this study

This study is a prospective clinical trial designed to compare the magnetic mallet technique with conventional drilling for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla characterized by soft bone quality (D4 bone). Achieving adequate primary implant stability in this region remains a clinical challenge, and techniques that preserve and condense bone may improve treatment outcomes.

The magnetic mallet technique uses controlled electromagnetic impulses to prepare the implant site through bone condensation rather than bone removal, potentially enhancing primary stability and reducing surgical trauma. In contrast, conventional drilling relies on rotational cutting instruments that remove bone and may generate heat, which can negatively affect bone vitality.

Eligible participants requiring dental implants in the posterior maxillary region will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: implant site preparation using the magnetic mallet technique or conventional drilling. All implants will be placed following standardized surgical protocols.

Primary outcomes will include the assessment of primary implant stability using objective measurement methods. Secondary outcomes will evaluate peri-implant bone response, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and overall clinical performance during follow-up.

The results of this study aim to provide clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of the magnetic mallet technique compared with conventional drilling, particularly in soft posterior maxillary bone, to support evidence-based decision-making in implant dentistry

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

where: patients with

  • healed edentulous posterior maxilla
  • residual vertical bone height ≥ 11 mm, allowing implant placement without sinus augmentation
  • bone quality classified as Type IV (D4) according to the Lekholm and Zarb classification

Exclusion criteria

where: patients with Systemic diseases affecting bone healing, active oral infection, smoking habits, or a need for bone augmentation procedures were excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Conventional drilling osteotomy

Device

implant site preparation using sequential rotary drills according to standard protocol.

Magnetic mallet osteotomy

Device

Implant site preparation using controlled electromagnetic impulses for bone condensation.

Primary outcomes

  1. implant stability

    Time frame: immediately after implant placement and at 3 months postoperatively

    Implant stability was assessed using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values , ISQ > 70: High stability. ISQ 60-69: Moderate stability. ISQ < 60: Low stability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain

    Time frame: 7 days after surgery

    Postoperative pain was assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Mosul

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Mallet and Conventional Drilling Techniques for Implant Placement in D4 Bone: A Prospective Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.