MAGIC Study: More Access to Group Integrative Care

Number of patients who enroll in IMGV at each clinical site.

Race of patients who enroll in IMGV at each clinical site.

Ethnicity of patients who enroll in IMGV at each clinical site.

Gender of patients who enroll in IMGV at each clinical site.

Age of patients who enroll in IMGV at each clinical site.

Number of clinic staff willing to form an implementation team to participate in delivering and implementing the IMGV at each clinical site.

Number of patients who perceive the IMGV to be acceptable based on qualitative data analysis.

Number of clinic personnel who perceive the implementation of IMGV to be acceptable based on qualitative data analysis.

Total cost of participation in the IMGV from the perspective of patients (ie total cost of time, accessing technology, childcare, out-of-pocket costs).

Total cost of implementation in the IMGV from the perspective of the clinic (ie total cost of staff time to implement the program, material costs).

Score on the Integrative Medical Group Visit (IMGV) Fidelity rating scale, measuring the extent to which core functions of the IMGV were delivered as intended by the clinic personnel. The scale includes 5 questions using a 0-3 point scale. Questions measure the constructs: fostering a safe and positive environment, fostering social support through the group, providing evidence-based medical advice, fostering collaboration, and providing access to integrative therapy experiential practice. Total range is from 0-15 with 0 representing the lowest and 15 representing the highest possible fidelity.

Number of IMGV sessions held at the clinic at 6 months since the first IMGV session at that clinic.

Number of IMGV sessions held at the clinic at 12 months since the first IMGV session at that clinic.

Patient report of physical function will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v2.0 Physical Function Short Form 4-a. This includes 4 questions assessing chores, ability to use stairs, walking, and running errands on a 5-point scale with end points of "without any difficulty" and "unable to do." Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a better outcome for physical function.

Patient report of anxiety will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 Anxiety Short Form 4-a. This includes 4 questions assessing feeling fearful, ability to focus on anything other than anxiety, worries, and feeling uneasy in the past 7 days on a 5-point scale with end points of "never" and "always." Higher scores reflect more difficulty. Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a worse outcome for anxiety.

Patient report of depression will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 - Emotional Distress-Depression - Short Form 4a. This includes 4 questions assessing feeling worthless, helpless, depressed, or hopeless in the past 7 days on a 5-point scale with end points of "never" and "always." Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a worse outcome for depression.

Patient report of fatigue will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 -Fatigue - Short Form 4a. This includes 4 questions assessing feeling fatigued, had trouble starting things because of feeling tired, run-down, and fatigued on average in the past 7 days on a 5-point scale with end points of "not at all" and "very much." Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a worse outcome for fatigue.

Patient report of sleep disturbance will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 -Sleep Disturbance - Short form 4a. This includes 4 questions assessing sleep quality, sleep was refreshing, problem with sleep, or difficulty falling asleep on average in the past 7 days on a 5-point scale with end points of "very poor" "very good" sleep quality and "not at all" and "very much" for all other questions. Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a worse outcome for sleep disturbance.

Patient report of ability to participate in social roles and activities will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities- Short Form 4a. This includes 4 questions assessing trouble doing regular leisure activities with others, trouble doing family activities, trouble doing usual activities at work, and trouble doing activities with friend on a 5-point scale with end points of "never" and "always." Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a better outcome for ability to participate in social roles and activities.

Patient report of pain interference will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.1 - Pain Interference - Short Form 4a. This includes 4 questions assessing pain interfering with day to day activities, work around the home, ability to participate in social activities, and household chores in the past 7 days on a 5-point scale with end points of "not at all" and "very much." Higher scores reflect more difficulty. Raw total scores range from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to a better outcome for pain interference.

Change in pain intensity will be measured before and after participation in the IMGV and assessed by the Pain Intensity sub-scale of the PROMIS-29 instrument. Pain intensity rating: 1 item from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), with pain intensity rated on 0-10 scale with lower values indicating less pain, or better outcome.

Total pain medication use will be compared through data from the electronic health record (comparing medications listed before initiating and after participation in IMGV).