Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04674254

Macular Perfusion Changes After Anti-VEGF Versus Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes. Since 1981, Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). For this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR.

Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy. Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases was recommended by some investigators. Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Giza, 11956, Egypt

About this study

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes.

Since 1981, PRP has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). for this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by DRCR.net has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR. However, the effect of both treatment modalities on macular perfusion has been inconclusive with no studies comparing the effect of both.

Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks and is being replaced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases.

OCTA is a new noninvasive method of acquiring high-resolution images of the retinal vasculature that can be utilized in the management and study of retinal diseases without the need for dye injection. It allows the visualization of both the superficial and deep retinal capillary layers separately and the construction of microvascular flow maps allowing quantitative analysis of vascular parameters.

OCTA uses high-speed OCT scanning to detect the flow of blood by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans repeated at the same location. Because of the movement of erythrocytes within a vessel, compared to stationary areas of the surrounding retina, only perfused blood vessels will result in signal decorrelation, leading to their imaging. The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio.

Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR without macular edema after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
  • PDR
  • Central macular thickness less than 300 µm

Exclusion criteria

  • Central macular thickness more than 300 µm
  • Previous retinal laser treatment
  • Ocular conditions that may affect macular perfusion (e.g. retinal vein occlusion, uveitis, vasculitis etc.)
  • Any previous treatment for diabetic macular edema.
  • Presence of epiretinal membrane involving the macula or vitreomacular traction
  • Media opacity such vitreous hemorrhage and dense cataract.
  • Patients with previous cataract surgery within the last 3 months.
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma
  • Thromboembolic events within 6 months
  • Tractional retinal detachment.

Treatment and study plan

Bevacizumab Injection

Drug

Bevacizumab will be intravitreally injected every 4 weeks through 12 weeks then pro re nata thereafter for 12 months.

Other names: Avastin

Targeted retinal photocoagulation

Procedure

Targeted retinal photocoagulation will be administered to nonperfused areas detected on fundus fluorescein angiography at baseline and repeated every 3 months as needed for 12 months.

Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation

Procedure

Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation will be applied to perfused and nonperfused areas of the retinal periphery at baseline and every 3 months as needed for 12 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in foveal avascular zone area

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in the foveal avascular zone area will be compared between the different treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

  2. Change in vascular density of the retinal capillary plexuses

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in retinal capillary vascular densities at different capillary layers will be compared between the different treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in neovessels

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in neovessels following treatment with each modality will be evaluated clinically and by fundus fluorescein angiography and the response to treatment will be classified according to the criteria of protocol S of the DRCR network

  2. Change in central macular thickness

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in central macular thickness will be evaluated following treatment with each modality using optical coherence tomography.

  3. Change in best corrected visual acuity

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in best corrected visual acuity will be assessed following treatment with each modality using standard Snellen charts.

  4. Change in macular sensitivity

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in the macular sensitivity will be assessed following treatment with each modality using macular microperimetry.

  5. Change in orbital blood flow

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    The change in orbital blood flow will be assessed following treatment with each modality using orbital color duplex imaging.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Macular Perfusion Changes in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Following Anti-VEGF Therapy Versus Targeted and Pan-retinal Photocoagulation Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Acronym: PROPER

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 19, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.