dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg
DrugStandard preparation as described for intravitreal injections.
Other names: Ozurdex
NCT Number: NCT02623426
The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema persisting or reoccurring after an intravitreal corticosteroid injection. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Macular edema (ME) is the most common structural complication and cause of visual impairment and legal blindness in uveitis patients. Traditional approaches to the treatment of uveitic ME have included the use of regional corticosteroid therapy, delivered periocularly, including posterior sub-Tenon's and orbital floor injections, or via the intravitreal route. While corticosteroid injections may reduce ME and improve vision, the effect is often variable with a limited duration. Persistent macular edema is a common occurrence and often requires repeated intravitreal injections of corticosteroids, which expose eyes to a significant risk of increased intraocular pressure ocular and cataract development. The often refractory nature of uveitic ME and its impact on visual function underscores the need to identify effective alternative medical therapeutic options. Recent pilot studies have shown intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) and intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) to be promising treatments for uveitic ME, and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA) has recently been approved by the U.S. FDA for uveitic ME in patients with non-infectious uveitis. In addition to being effective, intravitreal MTX and ranibizumab potentially may have less ocular side effects than corticosteroids, particularly less IOP elevation. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, ranibizumab, and dexamethasone implant. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative effectiveness trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patient level inclusion criterion
Eye level inclusion criteria - at least one eye must meet all of the following conditions
Greater than 300 μm for Zeiss Cirrus Greater than 320 μm for Heidelberg Spectralis Greater than 300 μm for Topcon SD OCT
Exclusion criteria
Patient level exclusion criteria
Eye level exclusion criteria - at least one eye that meets all inclusion criteria cannot have any of the following conditions
Standard preparation as described for intravitreal injections.
Other names: Ozurdex
Intravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to the injection.
Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to the injection.
Other names: Lucentis
Time frame: At 12-week visit
The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 12 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. The proportion of baseline subfield thickness is estimated by a mixed effect model that includes time points for baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 and the treatment group. The treatment effect is the interaction (product) of time point and treatment. Contrasts of the model parameter estimates were used to calculate the change from baseline to week 12 and the comparison between treatment groups.
Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases (improvement).The OCT outcomes were measured by masked readers. The 12-week visit was chosen as the time to assess the primary outcome because of the ranibizumab treatment schedule and the peak effect time for dexamethasone
JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials
Other
Acronym: MERIT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03753893
Amaurosis Fugax, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT02255032
Choroid Diseases, Choroidal Effusions
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02374060
Eye Diseases, Macular Degeneration
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00476593
Anterior Uveitis, Eye Diseases
Trondheim, Norway
View Trial Details