Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03673176

Lung Volume Reduction for Severe Emphysema by Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy

Since medical therapies offer only modest palliation and minimal hopes for improved survival to COPD patients, surgical therapies have been designed that may provide greater benefits in selected patients. Lung transplantation, for example, clearly improves survival and quality of life in patients with end stage COPD. This comes at substantial economic cost, however, as well as the at the cost of complications that may result from the complex surgery and from life-long immunosuppression. In addition, nearly all lung transplants will fail within 5 years as a result of progressive bronchiolitis obliterans, which we currently have no way to prevent or treat.

A second operation designed to treat severe COPD patients is lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). This operation, designed for patients with predominant emphysema rather than chronic bronchitis, is among the most carefully studied operations ever developed.

We believe that by reducing the volume of emphysematous lung with the precise target localization made possible by image-guided SABR, that we will be able to duplicate the benefits of surgical lung volume reduction with far less risk. We believe that this may represent a major advance in the therapy of emphysema - a highly prevalent disease. It may provide not only palliation but also increased survival, as does surgical lung volume reduction, in carefully selected patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Stanford Cancer Center

Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States

About this study

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR), also called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), is a relatively recent advance in radiotherapy which allows high doses of radiation to be transmitted to focused areas (typically malignancies), allowing higher rates of tumoricidal activity, generally lower complications, and greater convenience for patients since it can be delivered in 1 to just a few sessions. As the radiation is administered from multiple directions according to stereotactic planning, high doses can be delivered to the tissues with rapid fall-off to relatively low doses in even nearby, surrounding normal tissues. This technique was initially applied to brain tumors- an application which over the years has met with great success. More recently, it has been applied with substantial success and is gaining increasing acceptance as a primary mode of therapy for stage I lung malignancies, and malignancies in multiple other body areas.

In the lung, the rate of pneumonitis resulting from SABR is far lower than the rates incurred by conventional external beam radiotherapy. In conventional external beam radiotherapy reported pneumonitis rates range from 13-37% (7), depending on dose and field size. Reported rates of symptomatic pneumonitis after lung SABR are significantly lower and generally are ~5% (8). SABR does, however, typically leave a scar in the area of lung that has been treated (9). Importantly, there appears to be contraction of surrounding lung parenchyma into this scar resulting in an effect that is essentially a "lung volume reduction." One often sees clear loss of lung volume following any form of lung radiotherapy. With SABR, this "volume reduction" is achieved with a far lower risk of morbidity - in particular, less risk of pneumonitis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Pulmonary Function:

  • Severe COPD with severe reduction in quality of life due to dyspnea
  • Moderate to Severe emphysematous destruction of lung parenchyma on chest CT
  • FEV1 < 45% predicted and >18% predicted
  • FEV1/FVC < .7
  • DLCO > 18% predicted
  • Residual Volume > 160% predicted (by plethysmography)

Arterial Blood Gas:

  • paO2>40 on room air at rest
  • paCO2<55

General:

  • Successful completion of 16 sessions of pulmonary rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

  • Predominate chronic bronchitis (none or mild emphysematous destruction of lung on chest CT).
  • Pulmonary function tests / lung volumes that do not meet above criteria.
  • Active coronary ischemia (stress test required if clinical symptoms).
  • Inability to complete 16 sessions of pulmonary rehabilitation.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Presence of lung cancer.

Treatment and study plan

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)

Radiation

The prescribed dose will be 45 Gy in three fractions of 15 Gy, on each side that is treated.

Primary outcomes

  1. Count of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events.

    Time frame: 18 months

    Adverse events will be based upon National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline Value in Forced Expiratory Volume Percent Predicted

    Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18

    Forced Expiratory Volume will be taken both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (months 6, 12, and 18)

  2. Change From Baseline Value in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Liters)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18

    Forced Expiratory Volume will be taken both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (months 6, 12, and 18)

  3. Change From Baseline in Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Dioxide (% Predicted)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18

    Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Dioxide will be taken both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (months 6, 12, and 18)

  4. Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (Meters)

    Time frame: Baseline and month 6

    The walk test will be done both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (month 6)

  5. Total Lung Capacity (% of Predicted Value)

    Time frame: Baseline and date of last available time-point in follow-up period (up to 18 months)

    Total Lung Capacity will be measured both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (up to 18 months)

  6. Residual Volume (RV) (% of Predicted Value)

    Time frame: Baseline and date of last available time-point in follow-up period (up to 18 months)

    Residual volume (RV) is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. In other words, it is the volume of air that cannot be expelled from the lungs, thus causing the alveoli to remain open at all times.

  7. Short Form (SF)-36 Quality of Life Survey Score

    Time frame: Baseline and months 6

    The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) assesses limitations in physical functioning due to health problems, limitations in usual role because of physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions; the mental component summary (MCS) assesses vitality, limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems, limitations in usual role due to emotional problems, and general mental health. The PCS and MCS scores each range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Increases from baseline indicate improvement.

  8. Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18

    This is a patient-reported scale to rate the difficulty of breathing. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, wherein "0" indicates no difficulty breathing, and "10" indicates a maximal difficulty in breathing. Patients may report in whole numbers, from 0 to 10, in addition to reporting 0.5, which indicates "very, very slight (just noticeable) difficulty in breathing."

    A negative change in score indicates a reduction in patient-reported breathing difficulty. The greater the negative change, the better the patient-reported breathing.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stanford University

Other

Collaborators

  • Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.