Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06664658

Lung Ultrasound, Cholecystectomy, Atelectasis

Atelectasis is an important complication that can be seen during general anesthesia, especially in patients with lung problems and in patients having pneumoperitoneum. Application of PEEP during anesthesia may reduce the incidence of atelectasis.Lung ultrasonography is a tool that is easily accessible, can be applied at the bedside, is non-invasive, does not cause radiation exposure, and is increasingly used in daily practice in operating rooms. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the occurrence of atelectasis by using lung ultrasound, and to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound in determining the risk of developing atelectasis in patients ventilated with different PEEP values during general anesthesia. The study was conducted in 60 patients aged 18 and over, from ASA I-III groups, who were planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery at the Istanbul Medeniyet University Göztepe Training and Research Hospital General Surgery Clinic, and their written and verbal informed consents were obtained. The patients included in the study were divided into 2 groups. Among the patients who were going to be operated, 5 PEEP were applied to Group I (n=30) cases, and 10 PEEP to Group II (n=30) cases during ventilation with anesthesia device. All patients were evaluated by transthoracic lung ultrasonography before anesthetic induction, after tracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, and 15 minutes after recovery from anesthesia. According to the lung USG protocol, a total of 6 regions, including 2 quadrants of each hemi-thorax anterior wall, 2 right and left lateral walls, and 2 quadrants of the posterior wall, a total of 12 regions in each patient were scanned, and the images were evaluated. According to the modified lung USG scoring system, each region was scored between 0-3 consistent with the degree of atelectasis. The total score was calculated for each patient. Hemodynamic follow-up of the patients was performed. Anesthesia times, surgery times, and pneumoperitoneum times were recorded and compared.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Turkey Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Kadikoy, Turkey (Türkiye)

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients are aged 18 and over, from ASA I-III groups, who were planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not give consent
  • Patients who have previously undergone thoracic surgery
  • Patients with a body mass index > 40 kg/m²
  • Patients with severe COPD
  • Patients with serious pulmonary diseases
  • Patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
  • ASA IV patients
  • Patients with advanced cardiac and neurological diseases
  • Patients with mental retardation and limited cooperation
  • Patients who terminate their participation in the study for any reason during the trial
  • Pediatric age group Pregnant women

Treatment and study plan

peep 5

Procedure

he patients included in the study were divided into 2 groups. Among the patients who were going to be operated, 5 PEEP were applied to Group I (n=30) cases, and 10 PEEP to Group II (n=30) cases during ventilation with anesthesia device. All patients were evaluated by transthoracic lung ultrasonography before anesthetic induction, after tracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, and 15 minutes after recovery from anesthesia. According to the lung USG protocol, a total of 6 regions, including 2 quadrants of each hemi-thorax anterior wall, 2 right and left lateral walls, and 2 quadrants of the posterior wall, a total of 12 regions in each patient were scanned, and the images were evaluated. According to the modified lung USG scoring system, each region was scored between 0-3 consistent with the degree of atelectasis

peep 10

Procedure

he patients included in the study were divided into 2 groups. Among the patients who were going to be operated, 5 PEEP were applied to Group I (n=30) cases, and 10 PEEP to Group II (n=30) cases during ventilation with anesthesia device. All patients were evaluated by transthoracic lung ultrasonography before anesthetic induction, after tracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, and 15 minutes after recovery from anesthesia. According to the lung USG protocol, a total of 6 regions, including 2 quadrants of each hemi-thorax anterior wall, 2 right and left lateral walls, and 2 quadrants of the posterior wall, a total of 12 regions in each patient were scanned, and the images were evaluated. According to the modified lung USG scoring system, each region was scored between 0-3 consistent with the degree of atelectasis

Primary outcomes

  1. The study will terminate once a population of 60 patients is reached.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

    All patients were evaluated by transthoracic lung ultrasonography before anesthetic induction, after tracheal intubation, after pneumoperitoneum, and 15 minutes after recovery from anesthesia. According to the lung USG protocol, a total of 6 regions, including 2 quadrants of each hemi-thorax anterior wall, 2 right and left lateral walls, and 2 quadrants of the posterior wall, a total of 12 regions in each patient were scanned, and the images were evaluated. According to the modified lung USG scoring system, each region was scored between 0-3 consistent with the degree of atelectasis

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Medeniyet University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of the Impact of Two Different PEEP Levels on Pulmonary Functions in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Ultrasound

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Oct 29, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.