IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital
Milan, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07112976
At their institution, the investigators routinely assess the individual response of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure to higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by examining changes in lung aeration through lung computed tomography (CT). They typically obtain two lung CT scans during an end-expiratory hold, one at a PEEP of 10 cmH2O and another at 15 cmH2O. Recruitment and hyperinflation are measured by assessing the decrease in the volume of non-aerated lung regions (with a density greater than -100 HU) and the increase in the volume of hyperinflated lung regions (with a density of less than -900 HU) between the two CT scans. If recruitment exceeds hyperinflation, the response to higher PEEP is considered "positive", and medical doctors are encouraged to treat that patient with a higher PEEP. Conversely, if hyperinflation exceeds recruitment, the response is deemed "negative", and a higher PEEP is discouraged. This assessment is further complemented by a "PEEP test," during which gas exchange (specifically arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tension) and respiratory system mechanics (including compliance) are evaluated while ventilating with PEEP levels of 10 and 15 cmH2O.
In this retrospective analysis, the investigators will focus on patients with severe pneumonia who underwent the two lung CTs as part of their routine clinical practice. They will retrieve data on primary demographic characteristics, significant comorbidities, causes of pneumonia, severity of acute illness, and treatments delivered. Additionally, they will review the results of the quantitative analysis of the lung CT scans taken at 10 and 15 cmH2O, and the PEEP tests. The primary aim of this study is to determine the proportion of patients with net hyperinflation in response to higher PEEP.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Milan, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: The effects of a higher PEEP will be assessed by comparing the CT scans taken at ICU admission, with a PEEP of 10 or 15 cmH2O, within the same subject. Usually, the interval between the two CT scans is a few minutes.
The primary study objective is to evaluate the effects of higher PEEP with quantitative analysis of lung CT scans in patients with severe pneumonia. We hypothesize that 50% of these patients will exhibit more hyperinflation than recruitment.
We measure recruitment and hyperinflation by assessing the change in the volume of non-aerated lung regions (with a density greater than -100 HU) and hyperinflated lung regions (with a density of less than -900 HU) between the two CT scans.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Other
Effect of a Higher Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on Lung Hyperinflation and Collapse in Patients With Severe Pneumonia: a Computed Tomography Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03831906
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Kampong Cham, Cambodia
View Trial DetailsNCT07149909
Critical Illness, Cross Infection
Banhā, Benha, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05663905
Community-Acquired Infections, Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT03870243
Hypoxia, Infections
Dhaka, Mohakhali, Bangladesh
View Trial Details