NCT Number: NCT02912598
Lung Isolation in Thoracic Surgery - a Randomized Trial Comparing the VivaSight™ EB Endobronchial Blocker With Established Devices
Surgery involving the chest cavity, particularly VATS procedures, often require one-lung ventilation. The double-lumen tube (DLT) is considered the gold standard for lung isolation with different models of bronchial blockers (BB) used in special populations and circumstances. Their routine use is impeded by prolonged placement times, frequent malpositionings and higher costs when compared to the DLT, as recently reported in a meta-analysis by Clayton-Smith et al. The VivaSight™ SL+EB as a combination of a single-lumen tube with an integrated camera and a bronchial blocker allows for endobronchial placement without the use of a fiberoptic bronchoscope. An external monitor provides continuous visualization of the tracheal carina and the position of the bronchial cuff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the VivaSight™ SL+EB when compared to a left-sided double-lumen tube and established bronchial blockers. The investigators hypothesized a reduction in time to initial lung isolation due to the simplified placement procedure compared to other bronchial blockers. Continuous intraprocedural airway visualization may allow for early detection of dislocations. Necessary repositionings may be possible without additional bronchoscopies, reducing both disruptions of ventilation and maintenance costs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- age greater than or at 18 years
- scheduled for elective thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation
- written informed consent in anaesthesia, the study and anonymized data collection
Exclusion criteria
- necessary conversion between devices
- one-lung ventilation impossible to establish
- denial of the study or data collection
- surgical or anatomical circumstances preventing the use of a double-lumen tube
Treatment and study plan
Fuji Uniblocker™
DeviceETView VivaSight™-SL+EB
DeviceCOOK© Arndt Endobronchial Blocker
DevicePrimary outcomes
-
Time to initial lung isolation
Time frame: intraoperative
Duration of initial bronchoscopy-guided placement of the endobronchial ballon. Start: Beginning of direct laryngoscopy. End: Initial inflation of the endobronchially placed cuff.
Secondary outcomes
-
Ease of placement [numerical rating scale]
Time frame: intraoperative
Evaluation of difficulty of endobronchial device placement by the anaesthetist.
-
Rate of dislocation
Time frame: intraoperative
Number of device dislocations after correct initial placement. Measurement time point after termination of one-lung ventilation.
-
Quality of surgical exposure [numerical rating scale]
Time frame: intraoperative
Surgeon's grading of the quality of surgical exposure resulting from lung deflation. Time point is initial view of the thoracic cavity after pleural incision.
-
Oxygenation
Time frame: intraoperative
Measurement of arterial partial pressure of oxygen by blood gas analysis taken 5min and 15min after establishment of one-lung ventilation.
-
Bronchoscopies
Time frame: intraoperative
Number of additional bronchoscopies required after initial placement resulting from suspected or actual dislocations.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Lung Isolation in Thoracic Surgery - a Comparison of the VivaSight™ EB Endobronchial Blocker With Established Devices
Important dates
- Study start
- 2015
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Sep 23, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Sep 23, 2016
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Comparison of Airway Management With Bronchial Blocker and Double-Lumen Tube in Single-Lung Ventilation
NCT06299735
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsLeft Double Lumen Tube Selection
NCT06457763
One-Lung Ventilation, Pathologic Processes
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNomogram for Prediction of Alveolo-arterial Gradient During One-lung Ventilation
NCT06376123
One-Lung Ventilation
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsProtective Ventilation With High Versus Low PEEP During One-lung Ventilation for Thoracic Surgery
NCT02963025
One-Lung Ventilation
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details