University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
NCT Number: NCT06133816
The primary purpose of this study evaluate if different messaging impacts response rates to a brief survey (i.e., the simplified eligibility tool) that is designed to estimate pack-year eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). This will help inform the best way to increase response rates to the tool in future intervention studies designed to increase LCS, and expand upon survey methodology in general.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Despite growing evidence that lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-specific mortality, LCS across the United States is remarkably low. This is due in part to challenges with identifying adults who meet eligibility criteria for lifetime smoking intensity (i.e., 20 pack-years or greater), which is often missing from the electronic medical record. We have developed a simplified eligibility tool that has shown accuracy in estimating pack-years. But given the potential for low response rates, there is a great need to identify effective strategies to increasing response rates equitably prior to using it in practice or in future studies. The primary purpose of this study evaluate if different messaging impacts response rates to a brief survey (i.e., the simplified eligibility tool) that is designed to estimate pack-year eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). This will help to identify the best way to increase response rates to the tool in future intervention studies designed to increase LCS, and expand upon survey methodology in general.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Randomly assign patients to receive introductory message encouraging them to complete the survey (version A).
Randomly assign patients to receive introductory message encouraging them to complete the survey (version B).
Randomly assign patients to receive introductory message encouraging them to complete the survey (version C).
Randomly assign patients to receive norming message related to tobacco use (version A).
Randomly assign patients to receive norming message related to tobacco use (version B).
Randomly assigned patients to be entered into a drawing to receive a $100 gift card.
Time frame: 7 days
The proportion of participants that answers all three survey questions via text message among all those randomized.
Time frame: 7 days
The proportion of participants that answer at least one of three survey questions via text message among all those randomized.
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Other
Using a Simplified Tool to Predict Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) Eligibility: Experiment to Test Effects of Messaging on Response Rates
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00340405
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03117946
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Besançon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05832008
Adherence, Patient, Behavior
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06084208
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Nijmegen, Netherlands
View Trial Details