The Shepherd Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30332, United States
NCT Number: NCT07128901
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of wearable lower-extremity exoskeletons -a self-balancing device lower-extremity exoskeleton and a user-balancing device lower-extremity exoskeleton-to better understand their effects on the physiological responses to walking and the user experience in people with spinal cord injury.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Atlanta, Georgia, 30332, United States
Although Lower Limb Exoskeleton technology holds promise for improving mobility and independence in people with Spinal Cord Injury, limited research has examined the physiological and psychological effects of walking with self-balancing lower limb exoskeleton technology compared to systems that require user-operated assistive aids. Moreover, no studies to date have directly compared the short- and long-term outcomes of two lower limb exoskeleton technology types: (1) self-balancing and (2) user-balancing. To address this gap, this study will conduct a head-to-head comparison of self-balancing and user-balancing lower limb exoskeleton technology in individuals with motor-complete (ASIA Impairment Scale Classification [AIS] A/B) Spinal Cord Injury-a population that remains underrepresented in rehabilitation robotics research despite advances in the field.
Study participants will complete 5 walking sessions and 2 test sessions with two different exoskeleton devices in a randomized order. During each test session, data will be collected using motion sensors, portable metabolic monitors, and muscle sensors.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
User-balancing lower Limb exoskeleton
Self-balancing lower limb exoskeleton
Time frame: 1 year
This will be measured as the participant walks a distance of 10 meters at their self-selected (or comfortable) walking speed. Three 10-meter walk trials will be completed by each participant at each time point. The average of three 10MWT walking speeds will be analyzed and reported. This measure will be recorded in seconds and converted to meters/s with higher values indicating faster speed and lower values indicating slower speeds. Self-selected walking speed is highly correlated with functional ability and dependence.
Time frame: 1 year
This is a measurement of endurance and functional ability that assesses the participants ability to walk a distance (meters) over a time period of 6 minutes. It is measured in distance with greater distances indicating improved levels of endurance and functional ability.
Time frame: 1 year
Electromyography sensors will measure the magnitude of muscle activation for the torso throughout the gait cycle. The average magnitude will be computed by averaging the time-series data across gait cycles and computing the average magnitude for the average gait cycle.
Time frame: 1 year
Walking economy is a measure of the energy cost of walking, quantified as the amount of oxygen consumed per kilogram of body weight per meter walked. It reflects the metabolic efficiency of gait, with lower values indicating more efficient walking. This measure will be obtained using the Cosmed K5 indirect calorimetry system during steady-state walking.
Time frame: 1 year
The Rating of Perceived Exertion is a subjective measure of exertion based on an individual's perception of effort and fatigue during physical activity. The scale ranges from 6 (no exertion) to 20 (maximal exertion).
Time frame: 1 year
Total hemoglobin concentration refers to the amount of hemoglobin present in a given volume of blood. It is an indicator of muscle oxygenation dynamics. This measure will be obtained using continuous wave near-infrared spectroscopy.
Time frame: 1 year
A custom survey will be administered to assess participant opinion on exoskeleton comfort, ease of use, perceived effort and overall satisfaction.
Georgia Institute of Technology
Other
A Comparative Analysis of Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Technology for Non-Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04350359
Central Nervous System Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05822297
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cognition Disorders
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04736849
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details