Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University
Damascus, Syria
NCT Number: NCT03999307
The long time needed for orthodontic treatment is considered one of the biggest obstacles that make patients refuse to undergo orthodontic treatment. It also has many disadvantages including higher caries rates, gingivitis, and root resorption. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of two new noninvasive methods (Low-Level Laser Therapy and Corticopuncture) in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement for the implant supported En-Masse retraction of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–24 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Damascus, Syria
This study will be a randomized controlled trial with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Sample size was calculated using Minitab version 15. 36 Participants recruited from patients attending the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics at Damascus University with class II division 1 malocclusion that indicates the extraction of first maxillary premolars will be randomly assigned into one of three groups: Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) group, flapless corticopuncture group, or control group. Titanium mini-implants (1.6 mm diameter and 7 mm length) will be inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first molar at approximately 8-10 mm height above the archwires below the mucogingival junction. After complete leveling and alignment of the maxillary dental arch, which will be defined by passive insertion of 19*25 inch S.S. archwire, the retraction stage of the six maxillary anterior teeth will begin.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
ANB: 5 to 10 degrees. Overjet: 5 to 10 mm. Growth Pattern: normal or slightly vertical.
Exclusion criteria
LLLT will be applied in this group
Small holes in the cortical bone will be achieved using 1-mm diameter round surgical Tungsten bur
Typical orthodontic treatment with no LLLT or flapless corticopuncture
Time frame: The months required to complete the retraction procedure will be recorded, which is expected to be occur within four months
Assessment will be performed by calculating the time required from the beginning of the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction till the completion of this procedure
Time frame: The calculation of the rate of retraction will be done once the retraction procedure has finished which is expected to occur within four months
Assessment will be performed on study models by dividing the distance that the six maxillary anterior teeth moved during retraction to the time required to retract them to their ideal positions.
Time frame: This outcome will be measured one day before upper incisors' retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
Assessment will be performed on study casts by calculating the amount of mesial drifting of the maxillary molar (if any) in millimeters before and after retraction
Time frame: A CBCT image will be taken one day before the six maxillary incisors retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
Assessment will be performed by subtracting the root length of each maxillary anterior tooth after retraction from its length before starting retraction procedure.
Time frame: This outcome will be measured one day before the six maxillary incisors retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
Assessment will be performed clinically using the WHO probe
Time frame: This outcome will be measured one day before the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
Tooth vitality will be evaluated for each tooth of the six maxillary anterior teeth using Ethyl Chloride applied by a cotton roll on each tooth, which will indicate negative response (no vitality) or positive response (vital pulp)
Time frame: These levels will be assessed at: one day, one week, two weeks, and four weeks following the intervention
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires that include Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for each question, the scale has a minimum scale of 0 (no pain or discomfort) and a maximum scale of 100 (maximum pain or discomfort).
Time frame: The OHIP-14 will be assessed immediately after application, after 1, 7, 14, and 28 days of the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction initiation
Assessment will be performed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire; which is a questionnaire that include 14 questions regarding different aspects of problems that might be associated with retraction (discomfort, stress, chewing difficulties, ...). the patient could choose the answer from a five-point Likert scale (Never, Hardly ever, Occasionally, Fairly often, Very often)
Damascus University
Other
Evaluation of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Flapless Corticopuncture Effect on Accelerating Implant-Supported En-Masse Retraction of the Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth (Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07442825
Malocclusion, Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT07259720
Malocclusion, Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06403033
Malocclusion, Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Damascus, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT05610150
Malocclusion, Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial Details