Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07475533

Low-flow Versus Minimal-flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Study Synopsis This protocol is formatted for ClinicalTrials.gov-style registration and manuscript-facing documentation. It is based on the uploaded Turkish ethics protocol and keeps the original core design: comparison of low-flow and minimal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Background and Rationale Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is increasingly preferred for localized prostate cancer because of lower blood loss, reduced transfusion requirements, shorter hospitalization, and lower complication rates compared with open surgery. However, RALRP requires carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning, both of which may adversely affect respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamic stability.

Low-flow and minimal-flow anesthesia may improve humidification and warming of inspired gases, reduce inhalational agent consumption, decrease environmental waste, and potentially lower overall cost. Despite these theoretical and practical advantages, evidence remains limited regarding the physiologic safety and performance of minimal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia during long robotic pelvic surgery performed under pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning.

Accordingly, this randomized prospective trial will compare low-flow (1 L/min) and minimal-flow (0.5 L/min) sevoflurane anesthesia during RALRP with respect to respiratory parameters, arterial blood gas values, intraoperative oxygenation variables, anesthetic consumption, and selected postoperative biochemical markers.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patients aged 18 years or older.
  • ASA physical status I-II.
  • Scheduled for elective robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
  • Provision of written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria
  • ASA physical status III-V.
  • Severe cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease.
  • Mental status disorder or significant hearing impairment that prevents consent or communication.
  • Known anxiety, depression, or other psychiatric disorder judged to interfere with study participation.
  • Withdrawal of consent or investigator decision for safety reasons.

Treatment and study plan

Common Anesthetic Management

Other

Standard intraoperative monitoring including BIS, pulse oximetry, temperature, and anesthesia workstation-derived respiratory variables.

  • Arterial blood gas sampling after intubation, before pneumoperitoneum, after pneumoperitoneum/positioning, hourly during pneumoperitoneum, at the end of pneumoperitoneum in supine position, and before extubation.
  • Routine safety limits on the anesthesia machine: end-tidal carbon dioxide upper alarm 45 mmHg, inspired oxygen lower alarm 35%, inspired carbon dioxide upper alarm 3 mmHg.
  • Routine device self-test each morning and between patients.
  • Minimal dead space strategy with avoidance of unnecessary circuit extension.
  • Close monitoring of soda lime; replacement if inspired carbon dioxide reaches 3 mmHg even without obvious color change.
  • If clinically necessary because of blood gas deterioration, BIS changes, or any safety concern, fresh gas flow may be increased and the participant may be withdrawn from the protocol intervention.

Primary outcomes

  1. Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂)

    Time frame: intraoperative period, from post-intubation to before extubation on the day of surgery

    Comparison of arterial PaCO₂ values between the minimal-flow anesthesia group (0.5 L/min) and the low-flow anesthesia group (1 L/min) measured during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

    Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed at predefined intraoperative time points (T0: post-intubation, T1: before pneumoperitoneum, T2: after pneumoperitoneum and positioning, hourly during pneumoperitoneum, at the end of pneumoperitoneum, and before extubation).

Secondary outcomes

  1. End-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂)

    Time frame: intraoperatively

    Comparison of end-tidal CO₂ levels between the minimal-flow and low-flow anesthesia groups during surgery.

  2. Oxygenation parameters

    Time frame: Intraoperative period (T0-Text).

    Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) measured to evaluate intraoperative oxygenation.

  3. Inhalational anesthetic consumption

    Time frame: Postextubation

    Total sevoflurane consumption recorded from the anesthesia machine at the end of surgery.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Low-Flow (1 L/Min) and Minimal-Flow (0.5 L/Min) Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.