Northumbria University
Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8ST, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT06124911
The aims of this study were to:
1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy older adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength. 2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training in older adults.
Older adults are defined as being 60 or more years of age.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8ST, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Leg Press resistance training at 60% one-rep-max for three sets of five repetitions
Leg Press resistance training at 60% one-rep-max for five sets of five repetitions
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Participant quality of life (measured through focus group questions & SF-36)
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Using the biodex to do a 3 x 20s double-foot eyes-open balance test on Level 6.
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
A "brisk"-paced 6-minute walk test.
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Standing from a chair, walking to a point 3 metres away, turn, and return to the chair as quick as possible whilst walking.
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Maximal amount of repetitions a participant can stand up from a chair in 30-seconds.
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Participants one-repetition max on leg press machine.
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Mass and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Mass and Leg Press 1RM will be combined to calculate strength-to-mass ratio.
Time frame: At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Velocity (m/s) of leg press measured at post-intervention, using baseline one-rep-max.
Northumbria University
Other
Comparison of Two Low-dose Resistance Training Modalities on Strength, Functional Capacity, and Quality-of-life in Healthy, Community-dwelling, Untrained Older Adults: a Randomised Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720752
Behavior, Climate Change Anxiety
Islamabad, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06654869
Cancer, Neoplasms
Erzurum, Yakutiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05379504
Disabilities Multiple, Quality of Life
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details