Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06107855

Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults

The aims of this study were to:

1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength. 2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

30 year–59 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nortuhmbria University

Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8ST, United Kingdom

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants were eligible if they were between 30-60 years old
  • Uninjured
  • Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
  • Had not participated in lower-limb RT in the previous six months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants were excluded if they had either taken part in any lower-limb RT in the last six months
  • Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in RT
  • Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended PA guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense PA per week.

Treatment and study plan

Leg Press Resistance Training Machine

Other

Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality-of-life

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Participant quality of life (focus group questions & SF-36)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Balance

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Using the biodex SD to do a 3 x 20s double-foot eyes-open balance test on Level 6.

  2. 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    a "brisk"-paced 6-minute walk test.

  3. Timed-up-and-go (TUG)

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Standing from a chair, walking to a point 3 metres away, turn, and return to the chair as quick as possible whilst walking.

  4. 30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS)

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Maximal amount of repetitions a participant can stand up from a chair in 30-seconds.

  5. Strength (1RM)

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Participants one-repetition max on leg press

  6. BMI

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Additional measures calculated from participants test results

  7. Strength-to-mass

    Time frame: The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

    Additional measures calculated from participants test results

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northumbria University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life, Functional Capacity, and Strength in Untrained Healthy Adults: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 30, 2023
Registry last updated
Oct 30, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.