Balgrist University Hospital
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT03255616
This project aims to reveal the potential sensorimotor reorganization of sensory input in low back pain patients and its association with different motor control strategies in LBP.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health issue. Treatment of chronic LBP is still a major challenge due to a lack of pathophysiological understanding. Thus, understanding LBP pathophysiology is a research priority. Adaptions of motor control likely play a significant role in chronic or recurrent LBP because motor control is crucial for spine posture, stability and movement. Different motor adaption strategies exist across individuals with LBP and two phenotypes representing the opposite ends of a spectrum have been suggested; i.e. "tight" control and "loose" control over trunk movement. The former would be associated with reduced trunk motor variability, the later with increased trunk motor variability. This conceptual framework is very useful to explain maintenance and aggravating of LBP because motor control adaptations are expected to have long-term consequences, such as increased spinal tissue loading, associated with degeneration of intervertebral discs and other tissues. Several knowledge gaps need to be addressed to test the validity of this framework: 1) Do loose/tight control phenotypes indeed exist and/or do other motor control adaption strategies exist? 2) Is reduced/altered paraspinal proprioceptive input associated with LBP related to neuroplastic cortical changes, thereby affecting the organizational structure in sensorimotor cortices and top-down trunk motor control? 3) Do psychological factors influence the organizational structure in sensorimotor cortices and motor control strategies? To address these knowledge gaps, the objectives of the current project are: I) To establish motor control phenotypes in LBP. Proprioceptive weighting and biomechanical assessment of dynamic movement tasks, including subject-specific spine kinematic variability and its relationship to pain duration, negative pain-related cognitions, segmental loadings and paraspinal muscle forces, will be performed. II) To test whether cortical proprioceptive maps differ between healthy subjects and patients with LBP. Brain activation in response to thoracolumbar vibrotactile stimulation will be interrogated using functional magnetic resonance imaging data and univariate and multivariate analysis based on machine learning. III) To test whether proprioceptive maps demonstrate a relationship to spine kinematic patterns, pain duration and negative pain-related cognitions in LBP patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
healthy subjects:
Inclusion criteria
low back pain patients:
Exclusion criteria
healthy subjects:
Exclusion criteria
low back pain patients:
mechanical non-painful low- and high pressure stimuli to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients
non-painful vibrotactile stimulation within a frequency range between 20-150Hz to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients
Time frame: MR assessment, 30 minutes
supraspinal BOLD responses induced by mechanical and vibrotactile stimulations of the back recorded by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Time frame: Spinal kinematics assessment, 120 minutes
Sagittal and frontal plane lumbar and thoracic spinal curvature angles
Time frame: Spinal kinematics assessment, 120 minutes
segmental muscle forces (N/mm) during dynamic tasks
Time frame: Spinal kinematics assessment, 120 minutes
segmental loading (N) during dynamic tasks
Time frame: Proprioceptive assessment, 10 minutes
Sagittal plane repositioning errors assessed through lumbar and thoracic spinal curvature angles
Time frame: Postural stability assessment, 20 minutes
Center of pressure displacements during vibrotactile stimulation while standing on a force plate
Time frame: MR assessment, 20 minutes
Displacement (intervertebral angles) of the stimulated and adjacent spinal segments during mechanical pressure using dynamic T2 scans
Time frame: Medical assessment, 5 minutes
score of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiphobia (TSK) questionnaire
Time frame: Medical assessment, 5 minutes
scores of the Fear Aovidance Beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) in low back pain patients
Time frame: Medical assessment, 3 minutes
scores of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in low back pain patients
Time frame: Medical assessment, 1 minutes
Pain quality assessment using the PainDETECT questionnaire in low back pain patients
Time frame: Medical assessment, 2 minutes
Assessment of self-perception of the back using the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire
Time frame: Medical assessment, 2 minutes
scores of state and trait anxiety (STAI) questionnaire
Time frame: Medical assessment, 15 minutes
Assessment of the perceived harmfulness of back stressing movements using the electronic version of the PHODA questionnaire
Balgrist University Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06840795
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06843785
Back Pain, Balance; Distorted
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06837753
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06787079
Back Pain, Behavior
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details