Implantation
DeviceFractures of the distal fibula are treated with a trauma implant.
NCT Number: NCT05260463
aap001 is a randomized, controlled, subject-blinded, multi-center study to show the safety of the LOQTEQ® antibacterial silver-coated system is non-inferior in comparison with the uncoated LOQTEQ® system
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
Antimicrobial coatings of implants are of interest to reduce infection rate in orthopaedic surgery. Demonstration of clinical effectiveness of such coated implants to obtain market approval is challenging. The objective of this article is to define a design for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a silver-coating for locking plates for fracture treatment.
The study design has to respect different criteria, such as feasibility, focus on overall complications, such as functional impairment, fracture healing and infection rates. The study design was defined as randomized, controlled, subject-blinded, multi-center study in subjects with fractures of the distal fibula with a total of 184 patients. A number of 92 patients are planned for each of the two treatment arms with treatment of the fracture with a silver-coated device (first arm) or with an uncoated device (second arm). Inclusion criteria are closed and open fractures of the distal fibula with Gustilo-Anderson type I to Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB type older than 18 years. Primary outcome parameter is the Anticipated Adverse Device Effects (AADE) including all typical complications of this type of injury, such as functional impairment of the affected limb, non-union and infections based on a non-inferiority study design. Also, silver-typical complications, such as argyria, are included. Secondary parameters are infection rates and fracture healing. Follow-up of patients includes five visits with clinical and X-ray evaluations with a follow-up time of 12 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Fractures of the distal fibula are treated with a trauma implant.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
The primary endpoint for this study is the proportion of subjects with at least one predefined Anticipated Adverse Device Effect (AADE) within 12 months of implantation.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the proportion of subjects with device-related infections occurring after successful implantation of study device and end of the 12-month FU and compare the rate between treatment arms.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate fracture healing assessed by local and central reviewer and compare the rate of completely healed subjects between treatment arms.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the number of hospitalizations occurring in the first 12 months post-implantation and the nights spent in hospital and compare the numbers between treatment arms.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the change in AOFAS at each FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The change is defined as the difference between AOFAS at the respective FU and the AOFAS at the 1-week FU.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the change in average pain at rest at each FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The Change in Average Pain is defined as the difference between VAS value at the respective FU and the AOFAS at the 1-week FU.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the change in the disability rating index at each FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The change in DRI is defined as the difference between DRI at the respective FU and at the 1-week FU.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate all items assessed in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The changes from Screening will be compared between treatment arms for all FU visits.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the proportion of subjects with full weight bearing at each FU visit and compare this endpoint between the treatment arms.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the change in silver serum levels at each scheduled FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The change in silver serum level is defined as the difference between the respective silver level at the respective FU and the silver level at Screening/Enrollment Visit.
Time frame: Implantation until 12 months follow-up
Investigate the proportion of subjects with TEAEs during the 12-month FU and compare the rate between treatment arms.
aap Implantate AG
Industry
LOQTEQ® Antibacterial Pre-Market Study Randomized, Controlled, Subject-blinded, Multi-center Study of LOQTEQ® Antibacterial Locking Plates in Subjects With Fractures of the Distal Fibula
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06130397
Bone Fracture, Dislocation
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04274530
Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04964947
Fractures, Bone, Fractures, Open
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06504992
Fractures, Bone, Fractures, Open
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
View Trial Details