Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Section Center
Siena, 53100, Italy
NCT Number: NCT01441245
Intravenous loop diuretics is the therapy most commonly used to treat pulmonary congestion and systemic fluid overload. In theory, continuous infusion should allow for a more consistent diuresis, avoiding the sodium reabsorption in the distal tubule as well as the neurohormonal activation. This should lead to renal function improvement and BNP decrease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Siena, 53100, Italy
Patients were eligible if they were admitted with a primary diagnosis of ADHF, randomized within 12 h after hospital presentation, and with evidence of volume overload (pulmonary congestion) on a chest X-ray study and had BNP levels >100 pg/ml. Patients also displayed mild to moderate renal dysfunction with creatinine values up to 1.4 mg/dl. Some patients were supported with non invasive ventilation before randomization. Once the initial 12 h dose was determined, patients were randomized using a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated scheme to receive the furosemide dose either divided into a twice-daily bolus injection or in a continuous infusion (mixed as a 1:1 ratio in 5 % dextrose in water) for a time period ranging from 72 to 120 h. The randomization was casual, and the physicians did not previously know the assigned arm. The dose escalation and subsequent titration of furosemide was guided by clinical response in terms of urine output volume and body weight reduction .Before randomization, renal function parameters and BNP levels were measured in all patients. Subsequent titration of the furosemide dosage was at the discretion of the attending physician, but was guided by a dose-escalation algorithm based on the treatment response (weight loss and urine output volume), symptom improvement, changes in renal function, electrolyte balance, and chest radiography. The specific doses of furosemide and the use of additional agents to manage ADHF (dopamine, IV vasodilators, hypertonic saline infusion) were decided based upon blood pressure measurements, renal function evaluation and diuresis response. Supplementary treatment was left to the discretion of the treating physician. The duration of infusion was continued for up to 72 h, at 48 h the physicians had the possibility to adjust diuretic dose administration on the basis of the clinical response. After 72 h the treatment could be stopped or continued for an additional 36-48 h depending on the patient's condition and diuresis response. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined following the RIFLE criteria.
Abbreviations:
(AKI) Acute kidney injury (ADHF) Acute decompensated heart failure (BNP) B-type natriuretic peptide (CHD) Coronary heart disease (cIV) Continuous infusion (iIV) Intermittent infusione (eGFR)Estimated glomerular filtration rate (Hb) Hemoglobin (HF) Heart failure (Hct) Hematocrit (LVEF) Left ventricular ejection fraction (RBC) Red blood cells
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive furosemide dose divided into twice-daily bolus injection (group 0) or continuous infusion (group 1)(mixed as a 1:1 ratio in 5% dextrose in water) for a time period ranging from 72 to 120 hours. The mean daily diuretic dosage was similar in the two groups. The median time from presentation to randomization was 16 hours, and the median duration of study-drug administration was 112± 24 hours
Other names: Continuous vs intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion
Time frame: time period ranging from 72 h to 120 h.
this study aimed to evaluate the effects of continuous infusion of furosemide in comparison to twice daily regimens at similar doses with respect to changes in renal function in terms of creatinine levels and GFR, urine output and BNP levels from admission to discharge
Time frame: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 days
Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 13 days
evaluation of renal function in terms of changes in creatinine levels during hospitalization in the two arms.
Time frame: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 days
Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 13 days
Time frame: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 days
Time frame: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 days
Time frame: in-hospital
percentage of participants with hospital stay > 10 days
Time frame: in-hospital
University of Siena
Other
Continuous Versus Intermittent Loop Diuretics Infusion Dosing in Acute Heart Failure: Effects on Renal Function, Outcome and BNP Levels
Acronym: diurHF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05411991
Acute Heart Failure, Diuretics Drug Reactions
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06397404
Acute Heart Failure, Acute Kidney Injury
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07577596
Acute Heart Failure, Edema
Randers, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT00561483
Acute Heart Failure, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details