Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT07478094
This observational real-world study aims to evaluate the longitudinal clinical outcomes of adult patients with Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH), associated with chronic lung diseases such as interstitial lung disease, who are treated with inhaled iloprost in routine clinical practice.
Treatment options for Group 3 PH remain limited, and the use of pulmonary vasodilators is controversial due to potential worsening of gas exchange. Inhaled iloprost may provide a more selective approach by targeting well-ventilated lung regions. However, real-world data on its use in this population are scarce.
The primary objective of this study is to assess changes in clinical risk status over time using the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum risk model. Secondary objectives include describing patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and the evolution of functional parameters and biomarkers, as well as documenting relevant clinical events such as hospitalizations, treatment escalation, and discontinuation.
The study will retrospectively analyze data from approximately 50 adult patients with confirmed Group 3 PH who received inhaled iloprost as part of their routine care in a specialized pulmonary hypertension center. No additional patient contact or interventions will occur.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH), associated with chronic lung diseases such as interstitial lung disease, represents a common and clinically challenging PH phenotype, frequently associated with reduced exercise capacity, increased oxygen requirements, and higher mortality. Unlike pulmonary arterial hypertension (Group 1), where targeted therapies have demonstrated clear benefits, treatment options for Group 3 PH remain limited and are primarily focused on management of the underlying lung disease and supportive measures.
The use of systemic pulmonary vasodilators in this population is controversial due to the potential risk of worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxemia. Inhaled prostacyclin analogues may offer a more selective therapeutic approach by preferentially targeting well-ventilated lung regions, potentially mitigating these risks. Inhaled iloprost, approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension, has been used off-label in selected patients with Group 3 PH; however, available evidence is limited and largely derived from small or short-term studies. Data describing real-world patient profiles, treatment patterns, and longitudinal clinical outcomes remain scarce.
Risk stratification has become a key component of disease monitoring in pulmonary hypertension. The COMPERA 2.0 model, which incorporates clinical and non-invasive parameters into a four-stratum risk framework, has demonstrated sensitivity to detect prognostically meaningful changes over time.
This retrospective observational study aims to characterize the clinical evolution of patients with Group 3 PH treated with inhaled iloprost in routine practice. The primary focus is the longitudinal change in risk status according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model. In addition, the study will explore changes in functional parameters such as WHO functional class and six-minute walk distance, biomarker trends when available, patterns of iloprost use (including monotherapy or combination therapy), and the occurrence of relevant clinical events such as hospitalizations, treatment escalation, and treatment discontinuation.
Data will be obtained from existing medical records of patients followed in a specialized pulmonary hypertension center, without additional patient contact or intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)
Primary outcome is the longitudinal change in clinical risk category assessed using the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model (low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, high risk). Risk status will be determined based on available clinical variables (World Health Organization functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and BNP or NT-proBNP levels, when available). The analysis will evaluate the proportion of patients who demonstrate improvement, stability, or worsening of risk category during follow-up compared with baseline (defined as initiation of inhaled iloprost).
Time frame: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)
Within-patient longitudinal change in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class during follow-up compared with baseline (defined as initiation of inhaled iloprost). WHO functional class ranges from I (no limitation of physical activity) to IV (inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms), with higher classes indicating worse functional status.
Time frame: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)
Within-patient change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), measured in meters, comparing baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) and follow-up assessments during routine clinical care. Higher values indicate better exercise capacity.
Time frame: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)
Within-patient variation in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during follow-up compared with baseline. BNP and NT-proBNP are biomarkers of cardiac stress; higher values indicate worse cardiac strain and prognosis.
Time frame: From baseline (initiation of inhaled iloprost) through available follow-up assessments during routine clinical care (follow-up of 3 to 6 months)
Occurrence of clinically relevant events during follow-up, including pulmonary hypertension-related hospitalizations, therapeutic escalation, discontinuation of inhaled iloprost (with reason, when available), and all-cause mortality. These events will be descriptively summarized.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Other
AirFly: Longitudinal Outcomes of Patients With Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension Treated With Iloprost
Acronym: AirFly
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06336798
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07498244
Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases
Graz, Styria, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04691154
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04325217
Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Interstitial
Tokyo, Japan
View Trial Details