Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04006457

Long-Term PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

This is a global Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an investigational study drug (called PF-06651600) in adults and adolescents (12 years and older) who have alopecia areata. Eligible patients from the prior studies B7931005 (NCT02974868) and B7981015 (NCT03732807) will have an opportunity to enroll as well as patients who have not previously participated in either of these studies. The study is open-label and all patients entering the study will receive active study drug.

A sub-study of approximately 60 adult patients who are participating in the B7981032 study will be conducted at select sites in the US, Australia and Canada. The sub-study will evaluate the immune response to tetanus and meningococcal vaccines in patients who have received a minimum of 6 months of 50 mg PF-06651600.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

CINME Centro de Investigaciones Metabolicas, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

-

For de novo participants and participants from Study B7931005 and B7981015 with >30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study:

  • Clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) with no other cause of hair loss. Androgenetic alopecia coexistent with AA is allowed.
  • De novo participants >=12 to <18 years of age: >=50% terminal hair loss of the scalp due to AA, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis
  • De novo participants >=18 years of age and participants from Study B7931005 or B7981015 with >30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study: >=25% terminal hair loss of the scalp due to AA, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis
  • No evidence of terminal scalp hair regrowth within 6 months (de novo only)
  • Current episode of terminal scalp hair loss <=10 years (de novo only)

Exclusion criteria

-

For de novo participants and participants from Study B7931005 and B7981015 with >30 days between first visit in B7981032 and last dose in the prior study:

  • Hearing loss with progression over previous 5 years, or sudden hearing loss, or middle or inner ear disease, or other auditory condition that is considered acute, fluctuating or progressive
  • History of or current malignancies with the exception of adequately treated or excised non metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ
  • History of a single episode of disseminated herpes zoster or disseminated herpes simplex, or a history of more than one episode of localized, dermatomal herpes zoster
  • Infection requiring hospitalization, or parenteral antimicrobial therapy within 6 months prior to Day 1

Exclusion criteria

for all participants:

  • Participants who have previously taken Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors other than PF-06651600 must have received the last dose >12 weeks prior to the screening visit

Treatment and study plan

PF-06651600

Drug

50 mg oral tablets/capsules

Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

Biological

Single intramuscular injection administered to patients participating in the vaccine sub-study

Meningococcal (groups A, C, W-135 and Y [ACWY]) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine

Biological

Single intramuscular injection administered to patients participating in the vaccine sub-study

Primary outcomes

  1. Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.

  2. Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

  3. Main Study: Number of Participants According to Categorization of Vital Signs Data Until Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

    Vital signs including blood pressure included systolic blood pressure (SBP) [Millimeters of mercury, mmHg]) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate [beats per minute (bpm)] were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: SBP<90mmHg, DBP<50 mmHg and pulse rate<40mmHg.

  4. Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values Until Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until follow-up visit (4 weeks after last dose in Treatment period 1) (Up to Month 40)

    Criteria for laboratory abnormalities included:Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes (<0.8*LLN); Ery. Volume, Hemoglobin,Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration <0.8*LLN or >1.5*LLN;Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes (>1.2*ULN), Prothrombin Time(>1.1*ULN).Clinical Chemistry: Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin (1.5*ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase (>3.0*ULN); Albumin, Urate (<0.8*LLN and >1.2*ULN; Urea Nitrogen,Creatinine Cholesterol >1.3*ULN; Cholesterol <0.8*LLN or >1.2*LLN, Triglycerides,Potassium,Calcium < 0.9x LLN & > 1.1x ULN; Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite >=1; Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes >=20; Epithelial Cells>=6, Hyaline Cast>1; Bacteria>20. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria is included.

  5. Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Booster Response

    Time frame: Month 1

    Booster response to tetanus toxoid was defined as: >=4-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentration at Month 1 if the pre-vaccination concentration was <=2.7 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL); OR >=2-fold rise in anti-tetanus toxoid IgG antibody concentration if the pre-vaccination concentration was >2.7 IU/mL. Two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Until End of Study

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE was considered treatment emergent if the event had start date on or after the first dosing date of this study.

  2. Main Study: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation Until End of Study

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

  3. Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Until End of Study

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

    Vital signs including blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [Millimeters of mercury, mmHg]) and pulse rate (beats per minute [bpm]) were measured using an automated device in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.

  4. Main Study: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Until End of Study

    Time frame: From start of study intervention (Day 1) until end of study

    Following laboratory parameters were assessed: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Erythrocytes Erythrocyte (ery.) corpuscular volume, Ery. Mean Corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, Reticulocytes, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Neutrophils, Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Prothrombin Time, Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase; Albumin, Urate; Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Potassium, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Glucose, Creatine Kinase. Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, Protein, Hemoglobin, Urobilinogen, Bilirubin, Nitrite, Leukocyte Erythrocytes, Leukocytes; Epithelial Cells, Hyaline Cast, Bacteria. Clinically significant abnormalities will be determined by investigator.

  5. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Overall Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score <= 10 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

  6. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on Alopecia Areata (AA) SALT Score <=10 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

  7. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on SALT Overall Score <= 20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT overall score <=20 were reported. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

  8. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response Based on AA SALT Score <=20 at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), with lower score indicating less hair loss. 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

  9. Main Study: Change From Baseline in SALT Overall Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing division of scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score is sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

  10. Main Study: Change From Baseline in AA SALT Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into 4 quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss). SALT AA Score = SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), lower score= less hair loss. Baseline (Roll-over participants: Day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015; De novo participants: Day 1 from Study B7981032).

  11. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in Overall SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp terminal hair loss. A visual aid was utilized showing the division of the scalp hair into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each of the four quadrants given an accurate determination of the percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of the scalp in that area. SALT score is the sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. The SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology (e.g., including scalp hair loss due to both androgenetic alopecia and AA). An Overall SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.

  12. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 75% Improvement in AA SALT Score From Baseline at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 and 36

    SALT=quantitative assessment of AA severity based on scalp terminal hair loss. Scalp hair was divided into four quadrants (back, top of scalp, right side and left side), with each given an accurate determination of percentage of scalp surface area covered, representing 24%, 40%, 18%, and 18% of the total scalp surface area, respectively. Percentage of hair loss in these areas is multiplied by percent surface area of scalp in that area. SALT score=sum of percentage of hair loss in all areas and ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss) with lower score indicating less hair loss. SALT AA Score= SALT overall score minus SALT AGA score, where SALT overall score included any hair loss regardless of etiology and SALT AGA score included scalp hair loss only due to androgenetic alopecia. SALT AA score ranged from 0 (no hair loss) to 100 (complete scalp hair loss), where lower score=less hair loss. SALT 75 response= 75% or greater reduction from baseline in AA SALT score.

  13. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal EBA Score at Baseline

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyebrow hair. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.

  14. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Atleast 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline or Absolute Score of 3 in the Eyelash Assessment (ELA) at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in Participants Without Normal ELA Score at Baseline

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash. Higher scores represent lesser loss of eyelash hair.

  15. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    PGI-C is a self-administered single item questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. Participants were required to select their response on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (greatly worsened), 2=moderately worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=not changed, 5= slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, 7 (greatly improved). 95% CI was based on normal approximation.

  16. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations

    Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms with responses scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations with responses scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score was calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

  17. Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Hair Loss Improvement From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36, Among Participants With Score >=2 at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss from the scalp, eyebrows, eyelashes and body using a 5 point scale that ranged from 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with AAPPO domain scores of 0 = no hair loss or 1 = a little hair loss, among participants with score >=2 at baseline are reported.

  18. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

  19. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    Time frame: Baseline, At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. For roll-over participants originating from Study B7931005 or B7981015, baseline is day 1 from Study B7931005 or B7981015. For de novo participants, baseline is day 1 from Study B7981032.

  20. Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Depression Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The depression subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Total depression subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Improvement on HADS depression score was considered as achieving a "normal" depression subscale score indicative of an absence of depression. Among adults, a HADS-D score of 0-7 was considered "normal"; for adolescents, a HADS-D score of 0-6 was considered "normal". 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

  21. Main Study: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on HADS Anxiety Score At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    Time frame: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36

    HADS is a validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. The HADS consisted of 2 subscales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D). The anxiety subscale comprised of 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe anxiety). Total anxiety subscale score was calculated as the sum of 7 items and ranged from 0 to 21; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Improvement on HADS anxiety score was considered as achieving a "normal" anxiety subscale score indicative of an absence of anxiety. Among adults, a HADS-A score of 0-7 was considered "normal"; for adolescents, a HADS-A score of 0-8 was considered "normal". 95% CI was calculated based on normal approximation.

  22. Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=1.0 International Units Per Milliliter (IU/mL) at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

    Time frame: Month 1

    Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level >=1.0 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

  23. Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Anti-tetanus Antibody Level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

    Time frame: Month 1

    Percentage of participants with anti-tetanus antibody level >=0.1 IU/mL at Month 1 were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

  24. Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With >=4 Times Increase in Anti-tetanus Antibody Level From Baseline at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

    Time frame: Month 1

    Percentage of participants with >=4 times increase in anti-tetanus antibody level from baseline were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

  25. Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Fold Change in Anti-tetanus Levels Above Baseline Values at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

    Time frame: From Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) to Month 1

    Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Fold change was defined as the ratio of the post-baseline result to the baseline result. The assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5 * LLOQ except when pre-vaccination assay results is < LLOQ while postvaccination result is >= LLOQ, in which case the pre-vaccination value will be set to LLOQ.

  26. Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) of Anti-tetanus Antibody Levels at Month 1-Tdap Vaccination

    Time frame: Month 1

    Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5* LLOQ.

  27. Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With Human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) Titer >=1:8 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination

    Time frame: Month 1

    Percentage of participants with hSBA titer >=1.8 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

  28. Vaccine Sub-study: Percentage of Participants With hSBA Titer >=1:4 at Month 1 Post-vaccination for Serogroup C-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination

    Time frame: Month 1

    Percentage of participants with hSBA titer >=1.4 at 1 month post vaccination for serogroup C were reported in this outcome measure. Two-sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson exact method.

  29. Vaccine Sub-study: Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies for Serogroup C at Baseline and Month 1-Meningococcal ACWY Vaccination

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-vaccination on Day 1) and Month 1

    Geometric mean and 95% CI were calculated by exponentiating the mean logarithm of the observed data and the corresponding CIs. Assay results below the LLOQ were set to 0.5* LLOQ.

  30. Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With SAEs

    Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events.

  31. Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs

    Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.

  32. Vaccine Sub-study: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation

    Time frame: From day of vaccination (Day 1) up to 35 days post last dose of vaccine (up to Day 36)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs leading to discontinuation included participants who had an AE record that indicated that the AE caused the participant to be discontinued from the study or that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A PHASE 3 OPEN-LABEL, MULTI-CENTER, LONG-TERM STUDY INVESTIGATING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-06651600 IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT PARTICIPANTS WITH ALOPECIA AREATA

Acronym: ALLEGRO-LT

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 5, 2019
Registry last updated
Apr 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.