LHA intervention
BehavioralFor the IG, a 4-hour lesson consisting of 4 chapters and leaflets was delivered over 4 weeks, with one chapter per hour per week. Each LHA visited the assigned mother in the IG four times in a 4-week period.
NCT Number: NCT04562675
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of a lay health advisor (LHA) intervention on immigrant children's caries and preventive behaviors.This randomized controlled trial included mother-child pairs in the intervention group (IG) and a brochure-only control group (CG), respectively. The IG received a four-week one-on-one session by an LHA on caries-related knowledge and brushing techniques. Baseline and follow-up surveys were used to collect the data in caries experience and maternal caries preventive behavior.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year–48 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
A randomized experimental design was used. Vietnamese women whose children aged 2-6 years were recruited through churches, Chinese schools, immigrant service centers, kindergarten, or recommendations from LHAs in Kaohsiung City in Taiwan. Overall, 30 and 25 Vietnamese mother-child pairs were randomized into the IG and CG. G*Power (version 3.1.9.4) was used for power analysis. A power analysis was established by effect size as the mean difference of filled teeth change between baseline and 8-month follow-up measurement between the IG and CG, with sample size and 0.05 alpha level. The power was greater than 0.802, and research results have adequate power.All children underwent oral examination at baseline and at 1-week, 2- and 8-month follow-ups. Each child was examined by a dentist in accordance with the primary dentition caries experience.Each immigrant mother completed surveys at baseline and at 1-week and 8-month follow-ups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For the IG, a 4-hour lesson consisting of 4 chapters and leaflets was delivered over 4 weeks, with one chapter per hour per week. Each LHA visited the assigned mother in the IG four times in a 4-week period.
brochure-only for control group (CG)
Time frame: Change from Baseline dmft at 1 weeks after intervention
The caries status of each tooth was recorded using the dmft index, as follows: decayed (d), missing (m), or filled (f) tooth (t). For each child, caries experience was measured using the dmft index of primary teeth.
Time frame: Change from Baseline dmft at 2 months after intervention
The caries status of each tooth was recorded using the dmft index, as follows: decayed (d), missing (m), or filled (f) tooth (t). For each child, caries experience was measured using the dmft index of primary teeth.
Time frame: Change from Baseline dmft at 8 months after intervention
The caries status of each tooth was recorded using the dmft index, as follows: decayed (d), missing (m), or filled (f) tooth (t). For each child, caries experience was measured using the dmft index of primary teeth.
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 weeks after intervention
Item including that"Do you ask your child to brush his/her teeth?" The response was coded as zero (not/seldom/sometimes) or one (always). "How many times you help your child to brush his/her teeth every day?" The response was coded as zero (no/less than two times/day) or one (two or more times/day). "How long do you help your child brush his/her teeth every time?" The response was coded as zero (no/less than three minutes) or one (three or more minutes). "When was the last time that you took your child for a dental visit?" and "Why did you take your child for a dental visit?" The responses were coded as zero (last dental visit more than six months or dental visit for oral or tooth discomfort) or one (last dental visit six months or less and dental visit for regular checkup).
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 months after intervention
Item including that"Do you ask your child to brush his/her teeth?" The response was coded as zero (not/seldom/sometimes) or one (always). "How many times you help your child to brush his/her teeth every day?" The response was coded as zero (no/less than two times/day) or one (two or more times/day). "How long do you help your child brush his/her teeth every time?" The response was coded as zero (no/less than three minutes) or one (three or more minutes). "When was the last time that you took your child for a dental visit?" and "Why did you take your child for a dental visit?" The responses were coded as zero (last dental visit more than six months or dental visit for oral or tooth discomfort) or one (last dental visit six months or less and dental visit for regular checkup).
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 weeks after intervention
Maternal caries preventive behaviors toward children were collected by questionnaire.Ten statements were used to evaluate mothers' caries preventive knowledge, such as "Dental plaque is a major factor for oral disease" and "The Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) provides children with fluoride varnish twice a year." Possible scores ranged from zero to ten, with higher scores indicating a higher level of caries preventive knowledge. The Kuder-Richardson reliability test was 0.72 for this scale.
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 months after intervention
Maternal caries preventive behaviors toward children were collected by questionnaire.Ten statements were used to evaluate mothers' caries preventive knowledge, such as "Dental plaque is a major factor for oral disease" and "The Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) provides children with fluoride varnish twice a year." Possible scores ranged from zero to ten, with higher scores indicating a higher level of caries preventive knowledge. The Kuder-Richardson reliability test was 0.72 for this scale.
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 weeks after intervention
Maternal attitude toward oral hygiene were collect by questionnaire.Eleven statements measured mothers' attitude toward their children's oral hygiene, based on the research by Skeie et al. The responses were rated on a five-point Likert-scale ranging from one ("strongly disagree") to five ("strongly agree"), with the total possible score ranging from 11 to 55. Higher scores indicated more positive attitudes toward children's oral hygiene. Cronbach's α was 0.84 for this scale.
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 months after intervention
Maternal attitude toward oral hygiene were collect by questionnaire.Eleven statements measured mothers' attitude toward their children's oral hygiene, based on the research by Skeie et al. The responses were rated on a five-point Likert-scale ranging from one ("strongly disagree") to five ("strongly agree"), with the total possible score ranging from 11 to 55. Higher scores indicated more positive attitudes toward children's oral hygiene. Cronbach's α was 0.84 for this scale.
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 weeks after intervention
The following three statements were used to evaluate mothers' self-efficacy toward children's oral hygiene, based on the research by Hsu et al. "It is easy for me to help my children brush their teeth"; "I can help my children brush their teeth before bedtime" and "I can take my children to visit a dentist regularly." The scores ranged from one ("strongly disagree") to four ("strongly agree"), with the total possible score ranging from three to twelve. High scores meant that mothers were confident that they could appropriately manage their children's oral hygiene behaviors. Cronbach's α was 0.72 for this scale.
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 months after intervention
The following three statements were used to evaluate mothers' self-efficacy toward children's oral hygiene, based on the research by Hsu et al. "It is easy for me to help my children brush their teeth"; "I can help my children brush their teeth before bedtime" and "I can take my children to visit a dentist regularly." The scores ranged from one ("strongly disagree") to four ("strongly agree"), with the total possible score ranging from three to twelve. High scores meant that mothers were confident that they could appropriately manage their children's oral hygiene behaviors. Cronbach's α was 0.72 for this scale.
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Other
Long-term Effects of a Lay Health Advisor Intervention on Immigrant Children's Caries: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06649760
Caries,Dental, Dental Caries
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05969756
Caries,Dental, Caries; Initial
Huế, Thừa Thiên Huế Province, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT07538232
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Hangzhou, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06211582
Caries,Dental, Dental Caries
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details