NCT Number: NCT03596450
The main purpose of this study is to compare the effects of semaglutide (Ozempic®) with the effects of other treatments for type 2 diabetes in a normal practice setting. The participant will be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to one of the following treatment groups: Group 1: semaglutide (Ozempic®) (by injection into skin) Group 2: standard of care antidiabetic medication (oral or injectable). The participant has an equal chance of being in either of the treatment groups. Neither the participant nor the study doctor or study staff will be able to pick which group the participant is in, but the participant will know which study drug the participant has been assigned to. The study doctor will provide the participant with a prescription for the study diabetes medication based on the treatment group the participant is assigned. The participation will last about 2 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Western University Medical Center at WU of Health Sciences, London, Ontario, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be prescribed commercially available semaglutide s.c. and will be instructed to initiate treatment with semaglutide s.c. according to the approved label. The study doctor will determine the intended maintenance dose of semaglutide, as well as changes to the maintenance dose thereafter.
Participants will receive standard of care, defined as commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication other than semaglutide. Participants will be prescribed and instructed to initiate commercially available antidiabetic medication according to the approved label and, if relevant for the specific antidiabetic medication, adjusted at the discretion of the study doctor.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 90 days prior to randomization at week 0), year 1
Change in HbA1c from baseline to year 1 is presented in %-point.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 2.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 90 days prior to randomization at week 0), year 2
Change in HbA1c from baseline to year 2 is presented in percentage-point.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who attained individualized HbA1c target at year 1 is presented. Study physicians set and documented an individualized HbA1c target for participants prior to randomization based on their clinical judgement and knowledge of the participant. Yes: number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria (less than 8.0% if age ≥ 65 years or with defined comorbidities, otherwise less than 7.0%) at year 1 is presented. Yes: Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1; No: Number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change in body weight (in pounds) from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change in SBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change in DBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0 to year 2
Time to first study drug discontinuation during 2 years is presented. First study drug discontinuation=date of the first time a patient is not taking study drug as defined.
Time frame: Week 0 to year 2
Time to first treatment intensification (add-on) or change (switch) after randomization during 2 years is presented.
Time frame: Week 0 to year 1
Percentage of MPR for study drug medication adherence for the first year of the study is presented. Medication adherence referred to a participant's conformance to the provider's recommendation with respect to timing, dosage, and frequency of medication taken during the prescribed length of time. The MPR was used to assess adherence. MPR was calculated as follows: MPR (%) = Sum of days supply for all prescription fills*100/Total number of days in time period. MPR was capped at 100%. MPR was calculated from pharmacy claims data and irrespective of adherence to randomized treatment or changes to antidiabetic treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Number of hypoglycemic episodes leading to an inpatient admission or emergency room (ER) encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: At year 1
DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score measured at year 1 is presented. The DTSQc provides a measure of how satisfied participants are with their current diabetes treatment compared with previous treatment. It consists of 8 questions, which are to be answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3 (-3 = much less satisfied now to +3 = much more satisfied now), with 0 (midpoint), representing no change. Six questions are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score. The remaining two questions concern perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia, respectively. The DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score ranges from -18 to +18, with higher scores associated with greater treatment satisfaction.
Time frame: At year 2
DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score measured at year 2 is presented. The DTSQc provides a measure of how satisfied participants are with their current diabetes treatment compared with previous treatment. It consists of 8 questions, which are to be answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3 (-3 = much less satisfied now to +3 = much more satisfied now), with 0 (midpoint), representing no change. Six questions are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score. The remaining two questions concern perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia, respectively. The DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score ranges from -18 to +18, with higher scores associated with greater treatment satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 score at year 2 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: PCS Score and MCS Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 score at year 2 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: PCS Score and MCS Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (work time missed) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (work time missed) score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH activity impairment score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH activity impairment score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause healthcare resource utilization - mean number of inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - mean cumulative length of stay for inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Cumulative inpatient length of stay is the sum of the length of stay of all inpatient admissions a participant experiences from baseline to year 2.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - mean number of emergency room (ER) encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - mean number of outpatient encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - mean number of medication visits per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - number of participants with inpatient admission from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced inpatient admission; no: number of participants who did not experience inpatient admission.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - number of participants with ER encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced ER Encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience ER Encounter.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
All cause HCRU - number of participants with outpatient encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code. Yes: number of participants who experienced outpatient encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience outpatient encounter.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabetes related HCRU - mean cumulative length of stay for diabetes related inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Cumulative inpatient length of stay is the sum of the length of stay of all diabetes related inpatient admissions a participant experiences from baseline to year 2.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related ER encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related outpatient encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related medication visits per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabeted related HCRU - number of participants with diabetes related inpatient admission from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced diabetes related inpatient admission; no: number of participants who did not experience diabetes related inpatient admission.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabeted related HCRU - number of participants with diabeted related ER encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced diabeted related ER encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience diabeted related ER encounter.
Time frame: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2
Diabeted related HCRU - number of participants with diabeted related outpatient encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code. Yes: number of participants who experienced diabeted related outpatient encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience diabeted related outpatient encounter.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who attained individualized HbA1c target at year 2 is presented. Study physicians set and documented an individualized HbA1c target for participants prior to randomization based on their clinical judgement and knowledge of the participant. Yes: number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve individualized HbA1c target attained at year 2
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 2.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 2.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria (less than 8.0% if age ≥ 65 years or with defined comorbidities, otherwise less than 7.0%) at year 2 is presented. Yes: Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 2; No: Number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 2.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c >9.0% at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change in body weight (in pounds) from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change in SBP from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2
Change in DBP from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0 to year 1
Number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1; No: number of participants who did not report hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1.
Time frame: Week 0 to year 2
Number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 2; No: number of participants who did not report hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 2.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2.
Time frame: At year 1
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1.
Time frame: At year 2
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 2.
Time frame: Week 0 to year 2
Percentage of MPR for study drug medication adherence for the two years of the study is presented. Medication adherence referred to a participant's conformance to the provider's recommendation with respect to timing, dosage, and frequency of medication taken during the prescribed length of time. The MPR was used to assess adherence. MPR was calculated as follows: MPR (%) = Sum of days supply for all prescription fills*100/Total number of days in time period. MPR was capped at 100%. MPR was calculated from pharmacy claims data and irrespective of adherence to randomized treatment or changes to antidiabetic treatment.
Novo Nordisk A/S
Industry
Long Term Comparative Effectiveness of Once Weekly Semaglutide Versus Standard of Care in a Real World Adult US Population With Type 2 Diabetes - a Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details