Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00182481

LOMA: Long-Term Management of Asthma

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of induced sputum cell counts could guide treatment of asthma more effectively than the use of symptoms and breathing tests. The main outcomes where the time to the first exacerbation and the number of exacerbations.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare

Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada

About this study

Airway inflammation is an important component of asthma. It influences other components which include symptoms and airway functional (physiological) measurements. It is the primary target of treatment. However, it does not correlate closely with symptoms, need for symptomatic bronchodilator relief, or the physiological abnormalities. Furthermore, it can be of different types. As a result, physicians are poor at recognizing its presence or type. This is important because eosinophilic inflammation is responsive to corticosteroid while non-eosinophilic is not responsive.

The most comprehensive non-invasive or relatively non-invasive measurement of airway inflammation is by spontaneous or induced sputum cell counts. These are reliable, valid and responsive, the qualities of good measurements. They might therefore be clinically useful to guide individual treatment. In the present study we investigated this issue. We compared their use, in comparison with the use only of symptoms and spirometry, in preventing exacerbations of asthma. We chose prevention of exacerbations as the most important clinical outcome because these have the greatest impact on patient's quality of life, morbidity and healthcare utilization. The study comprised two Phases. In Phase 1, the minimum treatment to control sputum eosinophilia (as well as clinical criteria) in the Sputum Strategy, and clinical criteria in the Clinical Strategy, were established. In Phase 2, this minimum treatment was maintained and patients were seen every 3 momths and at exacerbations. The primary outcomes were the relative risk reduction for the occurrence of the first exacerbation and the length of time without exacerbation over 18-20 months in Phase 2 of the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • History of asthma for at least one year,confirmed objectively.
  • New or previously reviewed patients where the minimal treatment requirements have not been established within the last six months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Smokers or ex-smokers for less than 6 months with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years.
  • Other pulmonary co-morbidity (other than mild or moderate chronic airflow limitation).
  • Subjects having a co-existing illness that precludes them from the study.
  • Inability to give informed consent due to mental or legal reasons.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Known non-compliance with medications.

Treatment and study plan

Induced sputum cell counts

Procedure

inhaled corticosteroids and other asthma drugs

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Relative risk reduction for the occurence of the first exacerbation and the length of time without exacerbation during Phase 2 of the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcomes were

  2. The cellular type of exacerbation that was influenced,

  3. The severity of asthma that was helped,

  4. The dose of inhaled corticosteroid that was required,

  5. Symptom control,

  6. Quality of life,

  7. FEV1

  8. Methacholine PC20,

  9. Exhaled NO,

  10. Cost effectiveness and cost benefit of sputum cell counts, Airway structural changes

  11. Skin bruising score.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Registry information

Official study title

Long Term Management of Asthma (LOMA) Study- How Useful is the Sputum Count Compared With the Usual Clincal Variables?

Important dates

Study start
1999
Study completion
2001
First posted
Sep 16, 2005
Registry last updated
Dec 16, 2005

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.