NCT Number: NCT02391129
Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with pathological fractures,
- Vancouver type-A, Bl, and
- stable femoral prosthesis stem,
- Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)
Time frame: follow up of at least 1 year
Range of Motion of the hip
-
Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture)
Time frame: follow up of at least 1 year
boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation
Secondary outcomes
-
Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score)
Time frame: follow up of at least 1 year
Patient's Mobility assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Other
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Mar 18, 2015
- Registry last updated
- Mar 18, 2015
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Postoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Hip Fracture Patients: Exeter vs Anatomic SP2 Lubinus Stem
NCT03326271
Femoral Fractures, Femoral Neck Fractures
View Trial DetailsPost-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tıpmed™ Revision Hip Prosthesis System
NCT07653295
Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic Joint, Fractures, Bone
Balıkesir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsPeriprosthetic Fracture Registry (PPFx)
NCT03378557
Fractures, Bone, Periprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsSafety and Performance of the Biphasic Plate Distal Femur: A Multicenter Case Series
NCT06028971
Distal Femur Fracture, Femoral Fractures
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial Details