Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07339215

Local Antibiotic Concentrations With Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction

Infections after tissue expander breast reconstruction can lead to pain, additional surgeries, and loss of the reconstruction. This study will compare two types of antibiotic carriers used during surgery to help lower the risk of infection. One carrier is a non-absorbable PMMA disc, and the other is an absorbable antibiotic bead. Both release antibiotics directly into the breast pocket after surgery.

About 100 patients will be randomly assigned to receive one of these two carriers at the time of tissue expander placement. After surgery, small samples of fluid around the tissue expander will be collected during routine clinic visits. These samples will be tested to measure how much antibiotic is present over time. The study will also track infections, tissue expander loss, and other complications during the first 90 days after surgery. The goal is to learn how much antibiotic each carrier delivers and whether one method is more effective at preventing infection.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Infection remains a devastating complication in tissue expander-based breast reconstruction, potentially causing patient distress, multiple re-operations, explantation, and the failure of the entire reconstructive process. A promising strategy to reduce this risk involves the local application of antibiotic carriers-materials placed in the surgical pocket that elute high concentrations of antibiotics directly at the site where infections begin. Recent studies have shown that both non-absorbable polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) discs and absorbable antibiotic beads can significantly lower infection rates. However, the current evidence is limited because all prior studies are retrospective, lack direct comparisons between these carriers, and crucially, have no measurements of the actual antibiotic levels achieved in patients. This gap in knowledge leaves surgeons without clear, evidence-based guidance on which method is superior. This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to provide that definitive evidence. The investigators will enroll 100 patients undergoing tissue expander breast reconstruction at our institution. During surgery, each participant will be randomly assigned to receive either an antibiotic-impregnated PMMA disc or absorbable antibiotic beads placed in the breast pocket alongside the tissue expander. The study is meticulously designed to eliminate bias, with independent experts blinded to the treatment when assessing outcomes. The primary objective is to conduct a detailed pharmacokinetic analysis, measuring the concentration of vancomycin and tobramycin in the periprosthetic fluid over time. This will be achieved by analyzing seroma fluid aspirated during routine, scheduled post-operative clinic visits. This novel approach will not only provide data on whether the carriers work, but also how they work-how high the antibiotic levels reach, and for how long they remain effective. The secondary objective is to compare critical clinical outcomes, including surgical site infection rates, tissue expander loss, and other complications over a 90-day period. By directly linking precise, local drug exposure data with hard clinical endpoints, this research will for the first time establish a biologic gradient for efficacy and determine the comparative effectiveness of these two infection-prevention strategies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult females ≥18 years undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed).
  • Able to consent and comply with follow-up/aspiration visits.

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergy to vancomycin, tobramycin, or PMMA components.
  • CKD stage 4-5 (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m²).
  • Chronic immunosuppression (≥10 mg prednisone daily or biologic immunosuppressants).
  • Active systemic infection
  • Pregnancy, planning to become pregnant during the study, or lactation.
  • Lack of capacity to provide consent.
  • Prisoners

Treatment and study plan

Antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads

Device

Absorbable antibiotic beads containing vancomycin and tobramycin will be placed in the breast pocket at the time of tissue expander reconstruction. The beads dissolve gradually and release antibiotics directly into the periprosthetic space. This intervention allows comparison of antibiotic exposure, infection rates, and tissue expander complications relative to the non-absorbable PMMA disc.

Polymethylmethacrylate antibiotic disc

Device

A non-absorbable polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) disc containing vancomycin and tobramycin will be placed in the breast pocket at the time of tissue expander reconstruction. The disc is molded intraoperatively and designed to elute high local concentrations of antibiotics into the periprosthetic space. This intervention is intended to reduce early postoperative infection risk and allow pharmacokinetic sampling of antibiotic levels in seroma fluid during routine postoperative visits.

Primary outcomes

  1. Local antibiotic exposure (log-transformed AUC₀-₄ weeks)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Vancomycin and tobramycin concentrations will be measured in periprosthetic seroma fluid collected during routine postoperative visits. The primary endpoint is the log-transformed area under the concentration-time curve from week 0 to week 4 (AUC₀-₄ weeks), which will be compared between the PMMA disc and absorbable bead groups. This will be measured weekly from tissue expander placement (baseline), and weekly at each tissue expander fill until tissue expander exchange at 4 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical site infection rate

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Infections will be defined using CDC criteria. A blinded adjudication committee will review all suspected cases. The incidence of infection within 90 days after tissue expander placement will be compared between arms.

  2. Tissue expander loss

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Tissue expander loss is defined as explantation due to infection, wound breakdown, or other complications. The proportion of patients requiring explantation within 90 days of surgery will be compared between groups.

  3. Peak antibiotic concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Antibiotic concentrations of aspirated Seroma fluid will be measured at the time of tissue expander placement (baseline), and weekly there-after at the time of tissue expander fills from week 1 to week 4. The highest measured vancomycin and tobramycin concentrations in periprosthetic fluid samples will be recorded for each participant during the study period. Cmax will be compared between the two study arms.

  4. Any postoperative complication (non-infectious)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Complications including seroma requiring aspiration, hematoma, skin necrosis, dehiscence, or unplanned return to the operating room within 90 days will be documented and compared between groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Local Antibiotic Carriers in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.