Technical University Munich
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07519811
This study tests whether patients with blood cancer or other cancers better understand their medical information when it is rewritten in plain language by an artificial intelligence (AI) system.
When patients are discharged from the hospital, they receive a medical letter summarizing their diagnosis, treatment, and next steps. These letters are often written in technical language that is difficult for patients to understand. In this study, an AI language model running on the hospital's own secure servers rewrites parts of this letter into simpler language. A physician checks the simplified version before the patient receives it.
Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives both the standard medical letter and the AI-simplified version. The other group receives the standard letter only. A separate group of patients who do not speak German well will receive a simplified and translated version.
After reading their letter, all participants fill out a short questionnaire about how well they understood the information. The study takes place at TUM University Hospital (Klinikum rechts der Isar) in Munich, Germany.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Background:
Studies show that up to 40-80% of medical information conveyed during physician consultations is not correctly recalled or understood by patients. This problem is particularly relevant in hematology and oncology, where treatment regimens, prognoses, and side-effect profiles are complex. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to convert medical texts into plain language with high accuracy. However, prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical benefit of LLM-simplified patient synopses in routine care are lacking.
Study Design:
Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial with parallel group design. Randomization is 2:1 (intervention : control) using permuted blocks of variable size (4-6). An additional non-randomized translation arm enrolls patients with insufficient German language proficiency.
Intervention:
The locally implemented LLM system (on-premise, no external data transmission) automatically simplifies the following sections of the discharge letter: Current Status, Medical History, Epicrisis, and Further Management. A study physician reviews and approves the simplified version before it is given to the patient. The system is not classified as a medical device and is not used for diagnosis or treatment decisions.
Endpoints:
The primary endpoint is a comprehension score measured by a 5-item scale (10-point Likert, based on PEMAT), assessing overall comprehension and comprehension of diagnosis, treatment, next steps, and medical terminology. Secondary endpoints include patient satisfaction (EORTC QLQ-INFO25 subscales), subjective uncertainty reduction, format preference, physician review time, correction rate, and translation quality.
Statistical Analysis:
The primary endpoint will be analyzed using a t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. A clinically relevant difference of 1.5 points on the 10-point scale is assumed. With a standard deviation of 2.5, power of 80%, and alpha of 0.05 (two-sided), 136 randomized patients are required (91 intervention, 45 control). Accounting for a 10% dropout rate, 150 patients will be recruited for the randomized arms, plus 30 for the translation arm (total n=180).
Data Protection:
All data are pseudonymized and stored on secure hospital servers. No patient data are transmitted to external servers or cloud services. The study complies with GDPR.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A locally implemented large language model (GPT-OSS, on-premise) automatically rewrites selected sections of the hospital discharge letter (Current Status, Medical History, Epicrisis, and Further Management) into plain language. A study physician reviews the output for accuracy before it is provided to the patient. The system is not classified as a medical device and is not used for diagnosis or treatment decisions. No patient data are transmitted to external servers.
Time frame: At the time of hospital discharge (Day 0), assessed immediately after reading the synopsis (approximately 15-30 minutes after receipt)
Comprehension of the patient synopsis measured using a 5-item scale based on the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT; scores range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better comprehension), assessing overall comprehension and comprehension of diagnosis, treatment, next steps, and medical terminology. The score is calculated as the mean of all five items (range 0-10; higher scores indicate better comprehension).
Time frame: Day 0, assessed immediately after reading the synopsis
Patient satisfaction (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Information Module 25 [EORTC QLQ-INFO25] subscales; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better-perceived information)
Time frame: Day 0, before and after reading the synopsis
Single-item measure on a 0-10 scale, administered before and after reading the synopsis
Time frame: Day 0, assessed immediately after reading the synopsis
Categorical variable assessing which synopsis format the patient preferred
Time frame: Day 0, recorded at time of physician review
Time in minutes required for the study physician to review and approve the LLM-generated synopsis
Time frame: Day 0, recorded at time of physician review
Rate of necessary corrections made by the study physician to the LLM-generated synopsis prior to patient handout
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Krischan Braitsch, MD
CONTACT
Lisa C. Adams, MD
CONTACT
Technical University of Munich
Other
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Locally Implemented Large Language Models (LLMs) for Simplifying Patient Communication in Hematology and Oncology
Acronym: oncOPAL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05327023
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchiolitis
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07485855
Hematologic Diseases, Hematologic Neoplasms
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07572006
Hematologic Diseases, Hematologic Neoplasms
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07689630
Graft Versus Host Disease, Graft vs Host Disease
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial Details