Department of Physical Therapy, Speech and Occupational Therapy of University of São Paulo
São Paulo, 05360-160, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT04788706
Objectives: To investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) application combined with Russian Electrical Stimulation on pain, mobility, functionality, range of motion, muscular strength, and activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Design: Randomized controlled double-blind study. Setting: Specialist Rehabilitation Services.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 05360-160, Brazil
ABSTRACT Objectives: To investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) application combined with Russian Electrical Stimulation on pain, mobility, functionality, range of motion, muscular strength, and activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Design: Randomized controlled double-blind study. Setting: Specialist Rehabilitation Services. Participants: Eighty participants with knee osteoarthritis were randomized. Intervention: Participants were randomized into four groups: Group I (n=20; LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation), Group II (n=20; Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation), Group III (n=20; LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving LLLT application combined with Russian electrical stimulation), Group IV (n=20; Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Placebo laser application combined with Russian electrical stimulation). The groups treated with LLLT received treatments with invisible infrared laser (904 nm, 3 Joules/point). The Placebo groups received identical treatment, but the infrared laser output was disabled. The sessions occurred three times a week.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the change in knee pain and functionality (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (8 meters and Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscular strength (dynamometer), activity (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire) and medication intake.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation
Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Russian electrical stimulation
LLLT over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving LLLT application combined with Russian electrical stimulation
Placebo laser over three weeks followed by an eight-week receiving Placebo laser application combined with Russian electrical stimulation
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
numeric pain rating scale (0-10) with a minimal clinically important change of two points
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
Was measured using the Lequesne questionnaire (11 questions about pain, discomfort and function). Scores range from 0 to 24 (from 'no' to 'extremely severe' dysfunction).
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
Paracetamol
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
were evaluated by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test19 and the 8-meter walk test.20 The TUG test, a measure of functional mobility, quantifies in seconds the time that the individual needs to stand up from a chair, walk 3m, turn back toward the chair and sit down again. The 8-meter walk test measures the time and number of steps required for a person to walk 8m.
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
was measured with a universal goniometer (AESCULAP).
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
was estimated at maximal isometric force for the quadriceps, using a portable dynamometer (Lafayette, USA). Under stabilized conditions, patients, sitting with knees flexed at 60 (measured by a goniometer),21 were asked to extend the legs as far as they could. Three trials were conducted, and the mean value was obtained.
Time frame: 6 months from baseline (follow up)
was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire,22 which is self-administered and measures pain, frozen joints and physical activity. Increased scores suggest decreased activity.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Other
Efficacy of Low-level Laser Therapy Associated With Russian Electrical Stimulation in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07258693
Osteo Arthritis Knee
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06257537
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06965946
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06084988
Osteo Arthritis Knee
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
View Trial Details