Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01179828

Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain (Predictio)

Drug therapy in patients with chronic low back pain is a major challenge for physicians. One of the problems is the lacking knowledge in prediction of drug efficacy in a chosen patient. Usually one of the classes of pain medication is given to patients with a similar clinical picture, although different pain mechanisms may be responsible for this clinical picture.

Another reason for variable drug efficacy are genetic polymorphisms, this may be the reason why an unique drug produces different responses (from a lacking analgesic effect up to excessive effect or side-effects.

Quantitative sensory testing is a method that documents alterations in the pain perception system. Linking genetic polymorphisms to quantitative sensory testing may give us a tool for anticipation of drug efficacy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Andreas Siegenthaler

Dep. of Anesthesiolgy and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

About this study

Background

Drug therapy is an essential part of pain treatment. However, only a minor part of pain patients benefits from the available treatments or is able to tolerate the drugs. One important limitation of drug therapy is lack of instruments to predict their effect. Indeed, in clinical practice "classes" of drugs (e.g. antidepressants) are given to "classes" of patients (e.g. neuropathic pain patients). However, within those classes of patients very different pain mechanisms are likely to underlie the pain condition in different patients. If drugs affect part of these mechanisms, they will not work in all patients. Another reason for variability in drug responses is genetic variation leading to a spectrum of different responses to analgesics, from lack of efficacy to exaggerated responses, up to intolerable adverse effects.

Quantitative sensory testing comprises methods that document alterations and reorganization of the nociceptive system. Measuring an abnormal result in a chronic pain patient may provide us with the information that the underlying pain pathways somehow must be altered. An essential question is whether this information can be linked to drug efficacy in a mechanism-based treatment approach. A further important question is whether assessing genetic polymorphisms can explain different drug effects and hence help selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for individual patients.

Objective

We will test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between disturbances in specific pain mechanisms as assessed by quantitative sensory tests and analgesic efficacy after single-dose drug administration in patients with chronic low back pain. Genetic factors affecting drug metabolism and pain sensitivity will be analyzed as additional explanatory variables for drug efficacy.

Methods

Quantitative sensory testing: Heat pain threshold and tolerance, Ice water testing with central modulation of nociceptive input (DNIC), electrical pain detection and temporal summation (skin probe), pressure algometry with pain detection and threshold Drugs investigated: Imipramine, Oxycodone, Clobazam Blood samples: pharmacogenetics: Cytochrome variants CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, COMT haplotypes, CGH-1 variants, A118G of mu opioid receptor gene variants pharmacokinetics: kinetics of imipramine and desipramine

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Low back pain with NRS>2
  • Chronic low back pain since more than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

  • pregnancy
  • use of pain medication other than paracetamol and ibuprofen in the last 7 days
  • suspicion of radicular pain
  • suspicion of intervertebral disk herniation
  • foraminal intervertebral stenosis
  • suspicion of polyneuropathy
  • diabetes
  • parkinson disease
  • alzheimer disease
  • glaucoma
  • prostata hyperplasia or voiding problems
  • known heart rhythm problems
  • heart insufficiency NYHA 3-4
  • Systemic inflammatory disease
  • Ongoing oncologic disease
  • drug or alcohol abuse
  • Significant depressive disease (BDI-FS>9)

Treatment and study plan

Oxycodone 15mg

Drug

15mg single administration p.o.

Clobazam

Drug

20mg single administration p.o.

Imipramine

Drug

75mg single administration p.o.

tolterodine

Drug

1 mg single administration p.o.

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in NRS(pain scale) between measurement after and before drug administration

    Time frame: 07/2012

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients global impression of change scale after drug administration

    Time frame: 07/2012

  2. Pharmacogenetic variables(see before)

    Time frame: 07/2012

  3. Pharmacokinetics: measure of Imipramine and desipramine blood levels

    Time frame: 07/2012

  4. Reliability of repeated quantitative sensory testing in the same patient

    Time frame: 12/2010

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Other

Collaborators

  • Aalborg University
  • University of Bern
  • University of Zurich

Registry information

Official study title

Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain

Acronym: Predictio

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Aug 11, 2010
Registry last updated
Apr 6, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.