Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
NCT Number: NCT02363803
Diabetic nerve pain [painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy] is a common medical problem with few reliably effective treatments. There is some evidence that sensory testing may help determine how individuals will respond to analgesic therapy. In this study, the investigators are evaluating the relationship between sensory testing and subject response to lidocaine infusion therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy [DPN] is caused by diabetes-related metabolic damage to the sensory nervous system. It affects more than 3 million Americans and is leading cause of nerve damage-associated pain worldwide. Currently approved drugs such as gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine provide pain relief only in 1 out of 4 or 5 people with DPN, pointing to a great need to identify effective therapy for these patients. Recent literature suggests that certain methods of assessing sensory nerve function in neuropathic pain patients may provide prediction to individual analgesic response; however, no placebo-controlled studies have been performed with the primary goal of identifying treatment response predictors in DPN.
We propose in this study to examine whether sensory testing to determine mechanical pain threshold [MPT] or heat pain threshold [HPT] will predict the subject's response to IV lidocaine analgesic therapy. We hypothesize that people with painful DPN who have high MPT or HPT are more likely to respond to lidocaine treatment. This is a prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary objective of determining whether the results from the sensory testing predict the response to systemic lidocaine in patients with painful DPN.
Consented subjects will attend a screening visit and two intervention visits, during which they will undergo sensory testing and receive intravenous lidocaine or placebo infusion in a cross-over design. At enrollment, each patient will be assigned a study number, which will match a previously prepared computer-generated list of randomization numbers to determine the sequence of interventions: lidocaine and then placebo, or vice versa. An unblinded research nurse coordinator will be assigned to match the study number with randomized treatment sequence, and this person will prepare the study medications, which will look identical. This research nurse coordinator will not be involved at any stage at patient assessment or data analysis. The participants and all other study personnel will be blinded to the treatment allocation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
lidocaine is a sodium channel blocker/analgesic. It is approved for intravenous administration for cardiac arrhythmias.
Normal saline, approved for hypovolemia, and homeostasis.
Time frame: Baseline compared to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion
Spontaneous pain will be assessed on numerical rating scale NRS (0= no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) prior to infusion and then repeatedly for 120 minutes. The outcome measure will use the average of pain intensity measured at timepoints in the 60-120 min range after beginning of infusion. The mean %change in pain (from baseline) will be compared between lidocaine and placebo arms.
Time frame: - 60 minutes (baseline) and + 60 minutes of initiating infusion
Thermal and mechanical responses will be assessed at baseline and 60 minutes after infusions. Evoked intensities measured on a 0-10 sensory scale, where 5 is normal sensation, a number lower than 5 is reduced sensation and a number higher than 5 is greater sensation.
Time frame: Baseline to 60 minutes of initiating infusion
NPSI pain descriptors will be assessed prior to infusion of placebo and lidocaine (baseline) and again at 60 minutes post-infusion. Descriptors are expressed on a 0-10 scale; 0-minimum (least), and 10 maximum (worst) score.
Time frame: baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion
Correlation between Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT in mN) at baseline and reduction in spontaneous pain intensity (% reduction on 0-10 NRS) at 60-120 minutes (averaged) from the study drug infusion. The slopes (Pearson coefficients) of the correlation obtained from lidocaine vs. placebo will be compared.
Time frame: Baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion
Correlation between Heat Pain Threshold (HPT in degrees Celsius) at baseline and reduction in spontaneous pain intensity (% reduction on 0-10 NRS) at 60-120 minutes (averaged) from the study drug infusion. The slopes (Pearson coefficients) of the correlation obtained from lidocaine vs. placebo will be compared.
Washington University School of Medicine
Other
Predicting Individual Response to Analgesic Treatment in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05104047
Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03686423
Behavior, Diabetes
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03821675
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03800901
Arthritis, Asthma
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details