Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02363803

Lidocaine for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic nerve pain [painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy] is a common medical problem with few reliably effective treatments. There is some evidence that sensory testing may help determine how individuals will respond to analgesic therapy. In this study, the investigators are evaluating the relationship between sensory testing and subject response to lidocaine infusion therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

About this study

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy [DPN] is caused by diabetes-related metabolic damage to the sensory nervous system. It affects more than 3 million Americans and is leading cause of nerve damage-associated pain worldwide. Currently approved drugs such as gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine provide pain relief only in 1 out of 4 or 5 people with DPN, pointing to a great need to identify effective therapy for these patients. Recent literature suggests that certain methods of assessing sensory nerve function in neuropathic pain patients may provide prediction to individual analgesic response; however, no placebo-controlled studies have been performed with the primary goal of identifying treatment response predictors in DPN.

We propose in this study to examine whether sensory testing to determine mechanical pain threshold [MPT] or heat pain threshold [HPT] will predict the subject's response to IV lidocaine analgesic therapy. We hypothesize that people with painful DPN who have high MPT or HPT are more likely to respond to lidocaine treatment. This is a prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary objective of determining whether the results from the sensory testing predict the response to systemic lidocaine in patients with painful DPN.

Consented subjects will attend a screening visit and two intervention visits, during which they will undergo sensory testing and receive intravenous lidocaine or placebo infusion in a cross-over design. At enrollment, each patient will be assigned a study number, which will match a previously prepared computer-generated list of randomization numbers to determine the sequence of interventions: lidocaine and then placebo, or vice versa. An unblinded research nurse coordinator will be assigned to match the study number with randomized treatment sequence, and this person will prepare the study medications, which will look identical. This research nurse coordinator will not be involved at any stage at patient assessment or data analysis. The participants and all other study personnel will be blinded to the treatment allocation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18;
  • Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (Fasting Plasma Glucose > 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1C >6.5%);
  • Distal symmetric pain in lower extremities with duration of more than 3 months;
  • Presence of either numbness or at least 1 sensory disturbance (increased or decreased sensitivity) in the feet.
  • Spontaneous pain with intensity of ≥ 4 on 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Exclusion criteria

  • Not giving consent to participate in the study;
  • Unable to complete self-report pain questionnaire;
  • History of moderate to severe renal or liver failure;
  • History of other central or peripheral neurologic disorders;
  • History of cardiac arrhythmias;
  • Contraindication to intravenous lidocaine;
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Treatment and study plan

Lidocaine

Drug

lidocaine is a sodium channel blocker/analgesic. It is approved for intravenous administration for cardiac arrhythmias.

Placebo

Drug

Normal saline, approved for hypovolemia, and homeostasis.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Spontaneous Pain at 60-120 Minutes After Lidocaine Infusion Initiated (Assessed on 0-10 NRS)

    Time frame: Baseline compared to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion

    Spontaneous pain will be assessed on numerical rating scale NRS (0= no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) prior to infusion and then repeatedly for 120 minutes. The outcome measure will use the average of pain intensity measured at timepoints in the 60-120 min range after beginning of infusion. The mean %change in pain (from baseline) will be compared between lidocaine and placebo arms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evoked Mechanical and Thermal Sensation at Baseline and 60 Minutes After Infusion Initiation.

    Time frame: - 60 minutes (baseline) and + 60 minutes of initiating infusion

    Thermal and mechanical responses will be assessed at baseline and 60 minutes after infusions. Evoked intensities measured on a 0-10 sensory scale, where 5 is normal sensation, a number lower than 5 is reduced sensation and a number higher than 5 is greater sensation.

  2. NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) Descriptors of Pain at Baseline and 60 Min After Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline to 60 minutes of initiating infusion

    NPSI pain descriptors will be assessed prior to infusion of placebo and lidocaine (baseline) and again at 60 minutes post-infusion. Descriptors are expressed on a 0-10 scale; 0-minimum (least), and 10 maximum (worst) score.

  3. Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline MPT

    Time frame: baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion

    Correlation between Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT in mN) at baseline and reduction in spontaneous pain intensity (% reduction on 0-10 NRS) at 60-120 minutes (averaged) from the study drug infusion. The slopes (Pearson coefficients) of the correlation obtained from lidocaine vs. placebo will be compared.

  4. Change in Spontaneous Pain Intensity as a Function of Baseline HPT

    Time frame: Baseline to 60-120 minutes after starting the infusion

    Correlation between Heat Pain Threshold (HPT in degrees Celsius) at baseline and reduction in spontaneous pain intensity (% reduction on 0-10 NRS) at 60-120 minutes (averaged) from the study drug infusion. The slopes (Pearson coefficients) of the correlation obtained from lidocaine vs. placebo will be compared.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Predicting Individual Response to Analgesic Treatment in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Feb 16, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 15, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.