Viecuri Medical Center
Venlo, Limburg, 5912 BL, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT04458155
This study is a prospective, diagnostic, cohort study within the standard care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It compares the analytical performance of Siemens® point-of-care high sensitive troponin I testing in venous, plasma and capillary sample types. The investigators hypothesize that there is a good correlation between the Siemens® POC HS cTnI assay results for the three sample types and that the bias between different POC sample types reduces from ~10% to ≤ 5% when using heparinized transfer device for the capillary sample.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Venlo, Limburg, 5912 BL, Netherlands
In September 2019, the validation study 1.0 started, in which the cTnI result of the Siemens POC device on three sample types are compared. Interim analysis of the sample comparison was performed by regression analysis using Passing and Bablock, and calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient.
The Li-hep Plasma vs Li-hep venous blood show a very good correlation of 1.00-1.03 with an R of >0.99, so the results between these sample types can be used interchangeably. For the capillary sample vs the Li-hep sample (both blood and plasma) the slope is 8-12% higher. With a 8-12% higher response, the capillary test results may not be interchangeably used with the other 2 sample types.
It is remarkable that capillary samples give a higher response, since it was anticipated that the result may be slightly lower due to the possible dilution by interstitial fluid. The investigators hypothesize that the presence of the Li-heparin anti-coagulant in the venous draw lead to a slight reduction of the apparent cTnI concentration. By using a heparin coated transfer device for the capillary samples instead of an uncoated transfer device, this hypothesis will be tested.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Point-of-care (POC) high sensitive troponin I (HS cTnI) analysis in whole blood, plasma and capillary whole blood with the Siemens® device.
Time frame: 30 days
The primary objective is to compare the analytical performance of Siemens® point-of-care high sensitive troponin I testing in different sample types by using the coefficient of variation.
This comparison will comprise Siemens® POC capillary vs. Siemens® POC venipuncture and vs. Siemens® POC plasma (Sample comparison).
The primary objective will be achieved by taking:
Trained clinical staff will collect the different samples. All samples will be collected once, at one time point with a maximum of 10 minutes in between.
Time frame: 30 days
To compare the analytical performance of Siemens® point-of-care high sensitive troponin I testing in different sample types by using the Bland-Altman method.
Time frame: 30 days
The relationship between POC sample types by linear regression and Pearson's correlation.
Time frame: 30 days
To create an overview of baseline characteristics of the population.
Time frame: 30 days
MACE is is defined as a composite of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.
Time frame: 30 days
To determine the modified HEART score retrospectively based upon POC capillary results in the population.
Time frame: 30 days
To compare the retrospectively determined modified HEART score based upon POC capillary heparin coated transfer device with the retrospectively determined modified HEART score based upon POC capillary non-heparin coated transfer device.
VieCuri Medical Centre
Other
Sample Comparison With Siemens® Point-of-care Device for Cardiac Troponin I Assay by Using a Heparin Coated Transfer Device vs. Non-heparin Coated Transfer Device at the Emergency Department (Validation Study 2.0)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06404515
ASCVD, Acute Coronary Syndrome
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04125992
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Nablus, Palestinian Territories
View Trial DetailsNCT05409716
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Nablus, West Bank, Palestinian Territories
View Trial DetailsNCT01559467
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial Details