Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06421506

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Late Preterm or Early Term Born Infants

The aim of this study is to see if giving less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) during high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen treatment reduces the need for invasive ventilation in babies with breathing problems born 2-6 weeks early.

Less invasive surfactant administration is where surfactant (a naturally produced substance which helps open up the tiny air sacs in the lungs making it easier for babies to breathe) is given into the lungs by putting a small tube into the windpipe through the mouth whilst the baby is awake. The surfactant is given slowly and breathed in.

High flow nasal cannula is a form of non-invasive support where a machine delivers warmed, moist oxygen and air through short tubes in the nose.

The investigators will be assessing whether a lower percentage of neonates need invasive ventilation within 72 hrs from birth when they have had LISA during HFNC treatment, compared to when they don't receive this treatment.

The investigators will also be looking at the length of neonatal unit stay and the cost of the stay. The investigators will also be measuring the lung function of the babies before and after they receive LISA.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

34 week–38 week

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

This study is looking at babies born 2- 6 weeks early who have breathing problems soon after birth. Some babies need to go onto a breathing machine (ventilator) or require 'non-invasive' breathing support. Either a machine delivers warmed, moist oxygen + air through short tubes in the nose (humidified high flow nasal cannula, HHFNC) or a machine delivers oxygen and air via a small mask which fits over the nose (continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP). Mechanical ventilation via a ventilator, although life-saving, can cause problems such as infection and lung injury and, therefore, whenever possible baby's breathing is supported with 'non-invasive' methods. The use of CPAP in more mature babies may also cause discomfort or lung collapse, whereas use of HHFNC may avoid those problems. The lungs of healthy full-term babies naturally produce a substance called surfactant that helps open up the tiny air sacs in the lungs and makes it easier for them to breathe. Babies born early or those with problems at birth, do not have enough of their own surfactant or it does not work properly, causing difficulty in taking in oxygen. A natural, animal-derived surfactant medication can be given into the lungs, using a small tube put into the windpipe through the mouth. This is done routinely in ventilated babies born prematurely. More recently, a technique called 'Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)' has been developed that allows us to give surfactant to babies who are receiving 'non-invasive' breathing support (ie HHFNC) and, thus, avoiding the complications related to mechanical ventilation. A small tube is passed into the windpipe whilst the baby is awake and breathing (supported on HHFNC or CPAP) and the surfactant is slowly given and breathed into the lungs. At the moment, there have been no research studies assessing the use of LISA in more mature infants receiving HHFNC as 'non-invasive' respiratory support.

In this study the investigators want to determine if in babies born between 34 and 38+6 weeks gestation who have breathing problems and receive HHFNC oxygen treatment with LISA within 24 hours of birth will reduce the need for mechanical ventilation. The investigators will also be looking a the length on neonatal unit stay, and the cost of the stay. Lung function of the babies before and after they receive LISA will be measured.

There will be no change in the management of babies taking part in the study. Use of HHFNC, administration of LISA and respiratory monitoring is all part of routine practice. The investigators are asking for consent to analyse the routine monitoring that will be undertaken before, during and after the surfactant administration and follow up on the outcome of the baby after they have had the LISA procedure.

Surfactant is routinely used in babies and there are no extra risks from taking part in this study. HHFNC is routinely used to support babies of this gestational age who require respiratory support. There are no known or expected risks from using HHFNC with LISA but as of yet there have been no studies using this combination.

Giving surfactant may help to avoid mechanical ventilation and its side effects, but this has not been studied before in these gestational ages, hence the need for this study. Theoretically giving surfactant with HHFNC should aid even distribution of surfactant throughout the lungs whilst protecting the lungs from potential damage caused by other forms of non-invasive support such as CPAP but again there is not yet evidence supporting this.

The study will be running at King's College Hospital on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Denmark hill site and at the Local Neonatal Unit at the Princess Royal Hospital site. The study has received ethical approval and is due to commence imminently (May 2024). The study is aiming to recruit 245 patients which is estimated to take 2yrs and 4 months.

The study is funded by Chiesi Limited. The chief investigator for the study is Theodore Dassios: [email protected]

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants born at 34+0 to 38+6 weeks of gestation, requiring resuscitation at birth, but who achieve regular spontaneous breathing and have a heart rate over 100 beats per minute while receiving non-invasive support.
  • Infants enrolled in the Surfon trial, born at 34+0 to 38+6 weeks of gestation, who are less than or equal to 24 hours old and exhibit signs of respiratory distress, defined as an FiO2 greater or equal to 0.30 but less than 0.45 needed to maintain an SpO2 greater than or equal to 92% or a clinically significant work of breathing regardless of the FiO2 and a clinical decision to provide non-invasive respiratory support.

Exclusion criteria

  • Infants requiring intubation at birth
  • Infants with severe congenital anomalies.

Treatment and study plan

Less invasive surfactant administration during high flow nasal cannula treatment

Procedure

Surfactant distilled through a small tube inserted into the windpipe via the mouth whilst the baby is awake and supported with HFNC.

Primary outcomes

  1. The percentage of neonates needing invasive ventilation within 72 hours from birth

    Time frame: 72 hours from birth

    The percentage of babies requiring more respiratory support and therefore needing invasive ventilation within 72 hrs from birth. The percentage from the intervention group will be compared with the control group

Secondary outcomes

  1. The length of neonatal unit stay

    Time frame: The length of time the neonate is in hospital, up to 20 weeks

    The duration of stay on the neonatal unit will be compared between the babies receiving the intervention, and those who are not.

  2. The cost of stay as estimated via standard NHS tariffs according to level of care

    Time frame: The length of time the neonate is in hospital, up to 20 weeks

    Standard NHS tariffs will be used to calculate the total cost of the stay for the babies in the intervention vs control group.

  3. The lung function parameters two minutes before and two minutes after the administration of LISA

    Time frame: The first 24 hours of life

    The following lung function parameter: tidal volume will be measured for all babies receiving LISA.

  4. The lung function parameters two minutes before and two minutes after the administration of LISA

    Time frame: The first 24 hours of life

    The following lung function parameter: respiratory rate will be measured for all babies receiving LISA.

  5. The lung function parameters two minutes before and two minutes after the administration of LISA

    Time frame: The first 24 hours of life

    The following lung function parameter: fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) will be measured for all babies receiving LISA.

  6. The lung function parameters two minutes before and two minutes after the administration of LISA

    Time frame: The first 24 hours of life

    The following lung function parameter: End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2) will be measured for all babies receiving LISA.

  7. The lung function parameters two minutes before and two minutes after the administration of LISA

    Time frame: The first 24 hours of life

    The following lung function parameter: ratio of oxygen saturations/ fractions of inspired oxygen (SpO2/ FiO2 ratio) will be measured for all babies receiving LISA.

  8. The SpO2/FiO2 ratio will be measured two hours after LISA administration

    Time frame: The first 24 hours of life

    Lung function parameter: ratio SpO2/FiO2 will be measured two hours after LISA administration for all babies receiving LISA

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Eleanor Jeffreys, MBBS

CONTACT

[email protected]

+447519 974813

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Other

Collaborators

  • Chiesi Limited

Registry information

Official study title

Does Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) During High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Treatment Reduces the Need for Invasive Ventilation in Late Preterm and Term Born Infants With Respiratory Distress?

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 20, 2024
Registry last updated
May 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.