Cabozantinib
DrugGiven PO
NCT Number: NCT05012371
This phase II trial compares the effects of lenvatinib given in combination with everolimus to the effects of cabozantinib given alone in treating patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) and that got worse on a previous PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor. Lenvatinib, everolimus, and cabozantinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare the efficacy of lenvatinib plus everolimus versus cabozantinib in patients with mRCC who developed progressive disease after 1-2 lines of therapy, including a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare tumor responses to lenvatinib plus everolimus versus cabozantinib in patients with mRCC who developed progressive disease after 1-2 lines of therapy, including a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor.
II. To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and safety of lenvatinib plus everolimus versus cabozantinib in patients with mRCC who developed progressive disease after 1-2 lines of therapy, including a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor.
III. To compare overall survival (OS) with lenvatinib plus everolimus versus cabozantinib in patients with mRCC who developed progressive disease after 1-2 lines of therapy, including a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess whether alterations to c-MET, VEGF, mTOR, and FGFR are associated with response to therapy.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive lenvatinib orally (PO) once daily (QD) and everolimus PO QD. Cycles repeat every 30 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive cabozantinib PO QD. Cycles repeat every 30 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
≥ 10 mm. For malignant lymph node lesions, they must be at least ≥ 15 mm in short axis with conventional techniques or ≥ 10 mm with more sensitive techniques such as MRI or spiral CT scan. If the patient has had previous radiation to the marker lesion(s), there must be evidence of progression since the radiation.
Exclusion criteria
For hepatitis B virus (HBV), a positive test using HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) test. For hepatitis C virus (HCV), patients with a positive HCV antibody test and HCV RNA positive are excluded. If a patient is receiving HCV curative treatment, they must complete therapy and have HCV RNA below level of detection. For patients with a history of HCV infection, they are eligible if they have completed curative therapy and have HCV viral load below the levelof detection.
Given PO
Given PO
Other names: 42-O-(2-Hydroxy)ethyl Rapamycin, Afinitor, Certican, RAD 001, RAD001, Votubia, Zortress
Given PO
Other names: E7080, ER-203492-00, Multi-Kinase Inhibitor E7080
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Time from start of study drug until disease progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
To be compared between lenvatinib + everolimus versus cabozantinib. Monitored using Bayesian optimal phase 2 (BOP2) design with time-to-event endpoint.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
ORR is defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR).
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Defined as CR + PR + stable disease.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Evaluated using standardized questionnaires, including Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index 19 (FKSI-19), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Social Provisions Scale, and the Finding Meaning in Cancer Scale (FMCS).
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Time frame: Start of study drug to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years
OS is compared between lenvatinib + everolimus versus cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who developed progressive disease after 1-2 lines of therapy, including a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
A Phase II Study of Lenvatinib Plus Everolimus Versus Cabozantinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma That Progressed on A PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitor
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05122546
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07128680
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07383441
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07510334
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details