Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04660591

Length of the Femoral Stem in Arthroplasty Done for Patients With Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesion

Proximal femoral metastatic disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients.protecting the entire femur using long nail or long femoral stem was hypothesized to prevent future fracture.However we believe that long stem isn't always necessary and won't decrease the complication rate.noting it's increased complication rate in this high risk patient category .

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Skeletal metastasis is the third most common site of cancer metastasis after the lungs and liver, almost all patients with metastatic prostate cancer will have bone metastasis. And about 90% of patients dying from breast cancer has skeletal metastasis.

The most common site to which cancer metastasize to long bones is the proximal femur, especially to the intertrochanteric region and femoral neck, contributing to increasing incidence of impending and pathologic fractures of this site.(8) Recent advances in cancer treatment increased the longevity of patients, with subsequent increase in morbidity of metastatic disease and increased number of patients living longer with this condition .

To date, long femoral stem is most frequently used in cases of pathological and impending proximal femoral fractures. Its use is believed to add more stability and prophylactically protect the entire femur from newly developed distal lesions. However, long stems has more operative time, more cardiopulmonary complications and are more technically demanding compared to standard femoral stems arthroplasty.(5) Recent retrospective study by Xing et al reported comparable outcomes between standard, medium and long stems and concluded that the routine use of long stems is unjustified.Another recent report by Joel et al investigated the use of long femoral stem in 22 limbs, they reported no hardware failure with no cases of intraoperative cardiopulmonary complications, however they recommended larger comparative trials with rigorous methods to investigate the functional outcomes and complications of long femoral stems in proximal femoral metastatic lesions.

In face of the potential advantages in this patient population, the goal of this study is to investigate the use of standard length femoral stems and its results compared to long femoral stems in proximal femoral metastasis .

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • pathological or impending pathological pertrochanteric or neck femur fracture, regardless of the presence of distal femoral metastasis.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous arthroplasty in the same side. fractures or lesions involving the subtrochanteric region Pathological fracture due to metabolic disease

Treatment and study plan

femoral stem in hip arthroplasty

Device

using lateral approach to the hip we will compare the effect of femoral stem length on the oncological and functional outcomes in patients with proximal femoral metastasis.hip arthroplasty is a surgical procedure that involves changing the head of the femur (the ball) with or without replacing the articular surface of the acetabulum (the socket ).and replacing it with metal head based on a stem covered with cement to fix it to the bone of the femur.

Other names: cemented hip arthroplasty , hip replacement

Primary outcomes

  1. MSTS score

    Time frame: Implant-specific differences in postoperative functional outcomes will be determined and compared throughout the study period at different time points(preoperative, postoperative at one month, six months and one year)

    The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system is a disease-specific instrument to determine the physical and mental health for patients with extremity sarcoma

  2. survival

    Time frame: Implant-specific differences in survival will be determined and compared throughout the study period at different time points(preoperative, postoperative at one month, six months and one year)

    median and mean patient survival

Secondary outcomes

  1. visual analogue score

    Time frame: improvement of pain compared to preoperative status

    VAS as a measure for pain relief

  2. the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale of Performance Status

    Time frame: implant specific ECOG as a measure of patient functional level compared at different time points(preoperative ,one month ,six months and one year postoperative)

    is a simple measure of functional status. It has scores ranging from 0 to 5

  3. complications

    Time frame: will be reported during one year follow up

    postoperative infection (superficial or deep),dislocation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Cemented Long Versus Standard Femoral Stem Arthroplasty for Proximal Femoral Metastasis

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 9, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 20, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.