clinical observation
OtherUndergo observation
Other names: observation
NCT Number: NCT01169337
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well lenalidomide works and compares it to observation in treating patients with asymptomatic high-risk asymptomatic (smoldering) multiple myeloma. Biological therapies such as lenalidomide, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Sometimes the cancer may not need treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. It is not yet known whether lenalidomide is effective in treating patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma than observation alone.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Co Dublin, Ireland
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To study the risk of grade 3 adverse events that effect vital organ function (such as cardiac, hepatic or thromboembolic) or any grade 4 or higher non-hematologic adverse events among patients receiving lenalidomide as treatment for high-risk asymptomatic, smoldering multiple myeloma. (Phase II) II. To compare progression free survival where failure is defined as death or the development of symptomatic myeloma indicating treatment between patients receiving lenalidomide versus observation alone in high-risk asymptomatic, smoldering multiple myeloma. (Phase III)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the response to therapy of patients treated with lenalidomide as treatment for asymptomatic, smoldering multiple myeloma. (Phase II) II. To determine and compare the response rate, time to progression, 1-year progression-free survival probability, and overall survival between patients randomized to receive lenalidomide or observation in the setting of asymptomatic myeloma. (Phase III) III. To estimate the incidence of adverse events in patients receiving lenalidomide therapy for early-stage multiple myeloma. (Phase III)
CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES:
I. To describe the cohort in terms of gene expression profiling (GEP) and cytogenetic risk classification and evaluate baseline immune and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters. (Phase II) II. To evaluate the impact of therapy within GEP-defined risk groups and GEP as a prognostic marker. (Phase III) III. To study the effects of lenalidomide on laboratory markers of immune function. (Phase III) IV. To study the prognostic value of MRI-detected asymptomatic bone disease on clinical outcome. (Phase III) V. To evaluate the prognostic effect of baseline high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities on clinical outcome. (Phase III)
QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare quality of life (QOL) change between treatment and observation arms based on the functional (FWB) and physical (PWB) well-being components of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General (G) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure from registration (prior to initiation of treatment) up to cycle 24.
II. To examine the impact of differential treatment response (PFS), if observed, on QOL based on the FACT FWB+PWB up to cycle 48.
III. To obtain prospective data on myeloma specific QOL attributes, utilizing and evaluating the Multiple Myeloma Subscale (MMS).
OUTLINE:
PHASE II: Patients receive lenalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
PHASE III: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM A: Patients receive lenalidomide PO QD on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients undergo observation until progression to symptomatic myeloma.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then every 12 months for 5 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo observation
Other names: observation
Given PO
Other names: CC 5013, CC-5013, CC5013, CDC 501, Revlimid
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks while on treatment up to 24 weeks
Proportion of patients with grade 3 adverse events that effect vital organ function (such as cardiac, hepatic or thromboembolic) or any grade 4 or higher non-hematologic adverse events
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years
PFS is defined as time from randomization to progression or death, whichever occurs first. Patients are considered to have progression if both of the following criteria are met. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 2-year PFS rate.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from study entry, then annually for years 6-10
Response is defined as complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR).
CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow VGPR: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component < 100 mg per 24 hours
PR:
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from study entry, then annually for years 6-10
Response is defined as complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR).
CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow VGPR: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component < 100 mg per 24 hours
PR:
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for one year
PFS is defined as time from randomization to progression or death, whichever occurs first. Patients are considered to have progression if both of the following criteria are met. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1-year PFS rate.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years
TTP is defined as the time from randomization to progression. Patients are considered to have progression if both of the following criteria are met. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 2-year progression-free rate.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive among all randomized patients in the phase III part of the study. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 2-year OS rate.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Randomized Phase III Trial of Lenalidomide Versus Observation Alone in Patients With Asymptomatic High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03717844
Abnormalities, Multiple, Amyloidosis
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05283993
Abnormalities, Multiple, Amyloidosis
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03820817
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00520767
Amyloidosis, Immune System Diseases
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details