Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080, South Korea
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06148571
While cardiac resynchronization therapy remains the mainstay for advanced HF, it is not always feasible due to unfavorable anatomy of coronary sinus or pacing characteristics. In such cases, left bundle branch area pacing itself or left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy could be a rescue therapy for failed or unsuccessful biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing (or left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy) as rescue therapy for biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy is largely hypothetic and lack concrete evidence still.
Therefore, there is an unmet need for the registry purposed for left bundle branch area pacing among heart failure with mid-range (or mildly reduced) ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients to investigate its efficacy and safety.
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in heart failure patients with ejection fraction below normal using Selectra catheters.
Interested in participating?
Request Info19 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080, South Korea
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
left bundle branch area pacing locates ventricular lead into the interventricular septum to capture left bundle branch areas.
Time frame: The day of the procedure
The acute success of left bundle branch area pacing was defined as below:
Meet ≥2 criteria as follows evaluated at the end of the procedure.
Programmed (extra-stimulus testing) deep septal stimulation to differentiate left ventricular septal vs nonselective Left bundle branch capture
Time frame: 7 days from the procedure
Time frame: 1 year
The acute procedure-related complication was defined as the occurrence of the below-listed events within 7 days of the procedure.
(Death related to the procedure, Pocket hematoma, Pseudoaneurysm, Fistular, Vascular rupture, Device-related infection, Cardiac perforation, Cardiac tamponade, Septal perforation, Acute coronary syndrome, Pneumothorax, Hemothorax, Stroke, Pulmonary thromboembolism, Lead dislodgement)
Time frame: 1 year
The incidence of repeat left bundle branch area pacing procedures
Time frame: 1 year
The incidence of pacemaker upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy including biventricular cardiac pacing
Time frame: 1 year
The incidence of heart failure hospitalization
Time frame: 1 year
The incidence of cardiovascular death
Time frame: 1 year
The incidence of All-cause death
Time frame: 1 year
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)
Time frame: 1 year
Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (mm)
Time frame: 1 year
Left ventricular end systolic diameter (mm)
Time frame: 1 year
left ventricular global strain (%) if possible.
Time frame: 1 year
Left bundle branch area pacing lead parameter: capture threshold (V)
Time frame: 1 year
Left bundle branch area pacing lead parameter: sensing (mV)
Time frame: 1 year
Left bundle branch area pacing lead parameter: impedance (Ohms)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Seoul National University Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07020702
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiovascular Diseases
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial Details