Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06148571

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Ejection Fraction Below Normal

While cardiac resynchronization therapy remains the mainstay for advanced HF, it is not always feasible due to unfavorable anatomy of coronary sinus or pacing characteristics. In such cases, left bundle branch area pacing itself or left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy could be a rescue therapy for failed or unsuccessful biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing (or left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy) as rescue therapy for biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy is largely hypothetic and lack concrete evidence still.

Therefore, there is an unmet need for the registry purposed for left bundle branch area pacing among heart failure with mid-range (or mildly reduced) ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients to investigate its efficacy and safety.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in heart failure patients with ejection fraction below normal using Selectra catheters.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080, South Korea

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Eue-Keun Choi

CONTACT

[email protected]

82-2-2072-0688

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients previously diagnosed with heart failure with mid-range(or mildly reduced) ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, which was documented by an appropriate echocardiographic study (Left ventricle ejection fraction <50%), and
  • Patients with indications of cardiac pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients aged less than 19 years.
  • Pregnant.
  • Patients with an expected life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  • Patients with a mechanical valve for the tricuspid valve.
  • Patients who need atrial pacing only.
  • Patients who are not capable of receiving a transvenous pacemaker for any reason.

Treatment and study plan

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Device

left bundle branch area pacing locates ventricular lead into the interventricular septum to capture left bundle branch areas.

Primary outcomes

  1. The acute success rate of left bundle branch area pacing

    Time frame: The day of the procedure

    The acute success of left bundle branch area pacing was defined as below:

    Meet ≥2 criteria as follows evaluated at the end of the procedure.

    • Right bundle branch block configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing
    • Left bundle branch potential (Left bundle branch-Ventricular interval of 15 to 35ms)
    • Transition from nonselective Left bundle branch capture to selective Left bundle branch capture
    • Transition from nonselective Left bundle branch capture to left septal capture at near threshold outputs
    • Short and constant peak left ventricular activation time (stimulus to peak of the R wave in V5 or V6 [peak left ventricle activation time]) <75ms in non-Left bundle branch block and <85ms in Left bundle branch block

    Programmed (extra-stimulus testing) deep septal stimulation to differentiate left ventricular septal vs nonselective Left bundle branch capture

  2. Acute complications related to the procedures

    Time frame: 7 days from the procedure

    • Death related to the procedure
    • Vascular complications (pocket hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, fistular, rupture)
    • Device-related infection
    • Cardiac perforation or tamponade
    • Septal perforation
    • Acute coronary syndrome
    • Pneumothorax, hemothorax
    • Thromboembolic events (stroke, pulmonary thromboembolism)
    • Lead dislodgment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of acute procedure-related complication

    Time frame: 1 year

    The acute procedure-related complication was defined as the occurrence of the below-listed events within 7 days of the procedure.

    (Death related to the procedure, Pocket hematoma, Pseudoaneurysm, Fistular, Vascular rupture, Device-related infection, Cardiac perforation, Cardiac tamponade, Septal perforation, Acute coronary syndrome, Pneumothorax, Hemothorax, Stroke, Pulmonary thromboembolism, Lead dislodgement)

  2. The incidence of repeat procedures

    Time frame: 1 year

    The incidence of repeat left bundle branch area pacing procedures

  3. The incidence of pacemaker upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy including biventricular cardiac pacing

    Time frame: 1 year

    The incidence of pacemaker upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy including biventricular cardiac pacing

  4. The incidence of heart failure hospitalization

    Time frame: 1 year

    The incidence of heart failure hospitalization

  5. The incidence of cardiovascular death

    Time frame: 1 year

    The incidence of cardiovascular death

  6. The incidence of All-cause death

    Time frame: 1 year

    The incidence of All-cause death

  7. Left ventricular ejection fraction

    Time frame: 1 year

    Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)

  8. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter

    Time frame: 1 year

    Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (mm)

  9. Left ventricular end systolic diameter

    Time frame: 1 year

    Left ventricular end systolic diameter (mm)

  10. left ventricular global strain

    Time frame: 1 year

    left ventricular global strain (%) if possible.

  11. Capture threshold

    Time frame: 1 year

    Left bundle branch area pacing lead parameter: capture threshold (V)

  12. Sensing

    Time frame: 1 year

    Left bundle branch area pacing lead parameter: sensing (mV)

  13. Impedance

    Time frame: 1 year

    Left bundle branch area pacing lead parameter: impedance (Ohms)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Eue-Keun Choi, M.D. Ph.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

82-2-2072-0688

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 28, 2023
Registry last updated
May 19, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.