University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
NCT Number: NCT04502979
Infancy is an important target period for obesity prevention because once obese as an infant, the relative risk of remaining obese appears to rise with increasing age at great cost to both individuals and society. The ability to self-regulate energy intake (eating when hungry and stopping when full) is vital to obesity prevention and it is thought that this ability can be derailed by a chronic mismatch between parental feeding behavior and the infant's state (feeding in the absence of hunger and/or feeding beyond fullness). The study will test a novel intervention to help parents and pre-verbal infants better understand one another during feeding and it will offer new insight into how self-regulation of energy intake develops during infancy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 month–9 month
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Once obese as an infant, the relative risk of remaining obese appears to rise with increasing age. Thus, the early years of life have been posited as an important target period for obesity prevention. Widely viewed as a response to genetic, interpersonal, and environmental factors, obesity fundamentally reflects an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure. Self-regulation of energy intake aligned with physiologic need is essential to this balance. The process(es) by which infants begin to disassociate eating behavior from physiologic need is unclear, thus it is crucial to better understand predictors of individual differences in self-regulation of energy intake. It is well established that autonomic regulation may support infant behavioral regulation, suggesting that autonomic function may be a critical area to consider here. Moreover, self-regulation is strongly influenced by dyadic interaction quality during infancy, and findings reveal that more responsive interactions are associated with more effective autonomic regulation. A chronic mismatch between a caregiver's feeding behavior and the infant's state (feeding in the absence of hunger and/or feeding beyond fullness), is thought to contribute to obesity by undermining the infant's capacity to self-regulate intake; the current proposal will be the first to examine the effects on autonomic regulation. The investigators propose an intervention to enrich the capacity of mother-infant dyads to perform their respective interactive tasks. The investigators plan to teach mothers American Sign Language (ASL) signs indicative of hunger, thirst, and satiety, which they will in turn teach their preverbal infant. This training in ASL will be augmented with targeted information for mothers about infants' capacities to self-regulate energy intake in response to hunger and satiety and communicate those states with intention. Mothers also will be taught about expected development of infants' eating behaviors and nutritional requirements to support healthy growth.
Using a two-group randomized repeated measures design, this study aims to 1) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study methods, including recruitment, enrollment, and data collection (self-report, anthropometrics, video observations, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia [RSA]) for infants and their mothers; 2) evaluate the initial impact of the intervention on observed feeding interactions, reported infant feeding behaviors and maternal feeding behaviors/beliefs, and infant nutritional intake and growth; and, 3) explore preliminary data on concordance between dyadic feeding interactions and autonomic regulation in both mothers and infants (RSA). In addition to a variety of self-report and anthropometric measures, this study will use integrated behavioral (video) and physiologic (RSA) measures to better understand feeding dynamics and their relationship with obesity risk. Understanding these processes is essential for developing appropriate preventions, or interventions, that will help reduce the prevalence of early childhood obesity and its extension into later childhood and beyond.
Study Phases:
Screening: screening for eligibility and obtaining consent
Study Treatment: study intervention/experimental treatment from baseline visit ([Time 1 (T1)]: age 4-9-months) monthly until 3-months post-baseline ([Time 2 (T2)]: age 7-12-months)
Follow-up: 6-months post-baseline ([Time 3 (T3)]: age 10-15-months)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Parent Inclusion:
Infant Inclusion:
Exclusion criteria
Parent Exclusion:
Infant Exclusion:
Families will receive 4 monthly 1-hour sessions: (1) Signing with infants; (2) infant communication and responsive feeding; (3) nutrition, portion sizes, and neophobia; and, (4) infant intentionality.
Time frame: 6 Months Post-Baseline (T3)
The infant's length and weight (in clean dry diaper only) will be measured in triplicate, using a calibrated length board and digital scale. The mean of the three length measurements (cm) and the mean of the three weight measurements (kg) will be combined to report a sex-specific weight-for-length z score. Weight-for-Length Z scores are measures of relative weight adjusted for child length and sex. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to 50th percentile (median). Negative numbers indicate values lower than the median and positive numbers indicate values higher than the median.
Time frame: 6 Months Post-Baseline (T3)
Group mean of Kcal difference between dietary recall (mean of total Kcal from 2-day 24-hour recalls calculated in the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)) and age-and-sex-specific estimated energy requirements. Lower values represent greater precision of intake.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
Enhancing Caregiver-Infant Communication to Prevent Obesity
Acronym: LiTTLe Me
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03334266
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Fort Defiance, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03101943
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Shiprock, New Mexico, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06357299
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04782063
Body Weight, Hyperphagia
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details