Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01653704

Learning Crisis Resource Management: Practicing Versus Observational Role in Simulation Training

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness in learning crisis resource management (CRM) principles when being an active participant in simulation-based education versus being an observer participant. The investigators hypothesize that active participants will improve their CRM skills more than observer participants.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre

Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y3E9, Canada

About this study

This will be a prospective randomized controlled study. Participants will be randomized to one of two groups with stratification according to their level of training: the active group and the observer group. Each participant of the active group will be paired with one of the participants from the observer group. The active participant will manage individually a simulated crisis scenario (pretest) while the paired observer participant will observe the scenario from outside the simulation room using a video transmission system. Immediately after, both participants will be debriefed by a trained instructor focused on CRM principles. The same active and observer participants will then individually manage another simulated crisis scenario (post-test). Two independent raters, blinded to the study design and to the randomization groups, will review the videos of all scenarios in a random order and rate each participant on their CRM performance using a global rating scale (GRS).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • emergency medicine residents from the University of Ottawa

Treatment and study plan

observational role

Behavioral

observational role in crisis scenario

active role

Behavioral

active role in managing crisis scenario

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Ottawa GRS Score

    Time frame: 1 day

    The Ottawa GRS scale is a reliable and valid scale used to measure CRM performance in high fidelity simulation. The scale assesses five main CRM categories: leadership, problem solving, situational awareness, resource allocation and communication skills. In addition to these five categories, there is a category on overall performance of the participant. Each category is measured on a 7 point Likert scale with descriptive anchors to provide guidelines on alternating points along the scale. The categorical scores will be summed to give a total score of 6 to 42. Higher values represent a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jul 31, 2012
Registry last updated
Jan 14, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.