Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07435753

Leadership ThriveCircles

This study aims to strengthen leadership competencies among CU SOM faculty who have at least five direct reports by promoting meaningful behavior change in leadership practices and fostering a culture of peer support, to advance employee well-being and help reduce burnout among healthcare professionals. 125 leaders will take part in a six-month leadership development program consisting of 6 self-paced learning focus areas and 6 in-person sessions with peers to discuss. The investigators will evaluate the program's implementation process and its effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location contact

Amy Schamberg, EdS

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Carol Brown, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Liselotte Dyrbye, MD MPHE

CONTACT

[email protected]

Liselotte Dyrbye, MD MPHE

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Natalie V Schwatka, PhD MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

3037244607

Natalie V Schwatka, PhD MS

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

The goal of this project is to design, implement, and evaluate a creative, sustainable leadership development program - Leadership Thrive Circles - focused on helping supervisors: 1) lead with respect and inclusion by ensuring all team members feel valued and welcome; 2) communicate openly and transparently, 3) seek input regularly, 4) support each person's professional growth and aspirations, and 5) express genuine appreciation and gratitude for their contributions. This program will be grounded in evidence-based leadership practices that support professional well-being and help reduce burnout among healthcare professionals.

A core premise of this initiative is that leader well-being is foundational to team well-being. Leaders who experience fulfillment, support, psychological safety, and manageable stress are better positioned to model healthy behaviors, build supportive environments, and promote well-being among their direct reports. Thus, Leadership Thrive Circles is also intentionally designed to strengthen the well-being of leaders themselves-recognizing that investing in leaders produces positive ripple effects across entire teams and departments.

There is a recognized need for leadership development. While there is substantial evidence highlighting the importance of leadership in healthcare-and the core skills leaders should demonstrate with their teams-there remains a gap in programs tailored specifically to the unique needs of CU SOM leaders.

In addition, emerging research underscores that leader well-being directly influences workplace culture, team functioning, and the well-being and retention of faculty and staff. Leaders facing high stress, burnout, or misalignment may struggle to provide effective support, communication, and recognition-factors that the CU SOM well-being data consistently identifies as essential to a healthy, high-functioning environment. Addressing leader well-being is therefore not only beneficial for leaders themselves but also essential for promoting the well-being of their direct reports. Leadership Thrive Circles aims to fill this dual need by equipping leaders with both the skills and the personal well-being resources required to lead healthy, thriving teams.

The objectives are to: 1) Strengthen leadership competencies among CU SOM faculty who have at least five direct reports. 2) Promote meaningful behavior change in leadership practices among these leaders. 3) Foster a culture of peer support as leaders integrate new skills into their daily workflows. 4) Evaluate the program's implementation process and its effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Leader

  • CU SOM faculty member who is either a physician, advanced practice provider, licensed mental health professional, research scientist or other CU SOM faculty member
  • Works at least half time
  • Has at least 5 employees who directly report to them
  • Not participating in the CU Thrive Circle intervention (like this leadership program but NOT for those in a leadership role)
  • Willingness to participate in the breadth of the leadership program
  • Able to participate in the in-person sessions

Employee

o Direct report of a leader who is in the program

Exclusion criteria

  • Does not fit the criteria outlined above

Treatment and study plan

CU Thrive Leadership Circles

Behavioral

The CU SOM leadership program is based on the Wellness-Centered Leadership framework and Mayo Clinic Leadership Index behaviors, using a COMPASS-style peer group model to build leadership skills and community. Leaders complete brief pre-work and on-the-job practice challenges delivered through an online dashboard, then participate in facilitated peer sessions to discuss implementation successes and barriers. Sessions are led by trained leader-facilitators, with researchers not present, and include structured agendas to support consistent implementation and skill development.

Primary outcomes

  1. Burnout

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) - Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS MP) is a 22-item survey that covers 3 areas: Emotional Exhaustion (EE, range 0-54, higher score greater EE), Depersonalization (DP, range 0 - 30, higher score greater DP), and low sense of Personal Accomplishment (PA, range 0 -48, higher score greater PA). Each subscale includes multiple questions with frequency rating choices of Never, A few times a year or less, Once a month or less, A few times a month, Once a week, A few times a week, or Every day.

  2. Leadership

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Mayo Clinic Leadership Index (MLI) - a validated, self-report instrument developed at Mayo Clinic that asks healthcare professionals to rate their direct-report supervisor across key dimensions of well-being centered leadership, including inclusion, communication, empowerment, professional development, and recognition. The instrument is a 9-item questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree").

  3. Professional fulfillment

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI) - a validated instrument designed to measure professional fulfillment (positive aspects of work) among physicians and other healthcare professionals. It includes 6 items assessing intrinsic positive reward from work (e.g., meaningfulness, satisfaction, sense of contribution). It was measured on a Not at all true (0), Somewhat true (1), Moderately true (2), Very true (3), Completely true (4) scale.

  4. Leadership self-efficacy

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Leadership self-efficacy was measured with a modified version of the Mayo Leadership Index to assess their confidence in enacting each of the leadership behaviors. 8-items from the Mayo Leadership Index were modified to start with "I feel confident I can…" and were measured with the following scale: Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4), Neither Agree nor Disagree (3), Disagree (2), Strongly Disagree (1) scale.

  5. Belonging

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Adapted from the belonging assessment used in Hunderfund et al., Sense of Belonging Among Medical Students, Residents, and Fellows: Associations with Burnout, Recruitment Retention, and Learning Environment. Two items capturing participants' self-reported sense of belonging within key institutional contexts - within the school and their unit. This was assessed on a 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree scale.

  6. Social isolation

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Social isolation - the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 4-item short form of the social isolation scale was used. It was measured on a Never (0), Rarely (1), Sometimes (2), Often (3), Always (4) scale.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Organizational health climate

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    Organizational health climate assessment includes 10 questions assessing their organization and supervisors engagement in practices that support employee health. It was measured using a Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4), Neither Agree nor Disagree (3), Disagree (2), Strongly Disagree (1) scale.

  2. General self-efficacy

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    General self-efficacy measures an individual's broad, stable belief in their own capacity to cope with a variety of challenging demands, and has been identified as an influential variable related to adaptation to stress and chronic illness. This was measured with Romppel et al.'s (2013) measure. It has 6-items measured with a Not at all true (1), Hardly true (2), Moderately true (3), Exactly true (4) scale.

  3. Intent to leave

    Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately after the intervention and at 3-months follow-up

    This outcome is assessed via a single self-report survey item developed for this study to capture an individual's perceived likelihood of leaving employment with the CU SOM within the next two years. The item is designed to serve as a pragmatic indicator of turnover intention, a commonly reported correlate of well-being, job satisfaction, and organizational climate in healthcare workforce research.Higher scores indicate a greater self-reported likelihood of leaving CU SOM within the next two years (i.e., stronger turnover intention).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Liselotte Dyrbye, MD MPHE

CONTACT

[email protected]

Natalie V Schwatka, PhD MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

13037244607

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Colorado School of Public Health

Other

Collaborators

  • CU Thrive: Office for Well-being | Center for Workplace Well-being Research
  • University of Colorado, Denver

Registry information

Official study title

Leadership ThriveCircles for Well-Being at University of Colorado School of Medicine (CU SOM)

Acronym: Leadership

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.