LBH589
DrugOther names: panobinostat, Farydak
NCT Number: NCT00859222
The purpose of this research study is to determine the amount of LBH589 that can be given to people safely when LBH589 is given in combination with bevacizumab. LBH589 in combination with bevacizumab is a drug combination that may stop cancer cells from growing abnormally. LBH589 has been used alone in other trials for solid tumor malignancies. Bevacizumab is FDA approved for use in patients with colorectal cancer and has been studied extensively in other types of solid tumors. The combination of LBH589 and bevacizumab has not yet been studied but information from other studies suggests that the combination may help prevent the growth of the participant's tumor.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Phase I
Primary Objective
Secondary Objective
Phase II
Primary Objective
Secondary Objectives
Exploratory Objectives
Statistical Design
The Phase I study follows a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Three potential dose levels of oral LBH589 3x per week days 1, 3 and 5 are under evaluation including a starting dose 0 on a weekly schedule as well as dose level 2 and a de-escalation dose level 1 on a weekly schedule. [Note: The study was amended to revise the starting dose due to concerns for thrombocytopenia with the weekly dosing regimen.] The DLT observation period is the first 30 days of treatment. For the Phase II study, based on prior research of bevacizumab monotherapy, a PFS6 rate of 35% does not justify further utilization of LBH589 in combination with bevacizumab while a PFS6 rate of 55% is worthy of further study. With 41 GBM eligible participants in the Phase II study, the treatment would be deemed promising if at least 20 GBM participants achieve 6-month progression-free survival. This design has at least 85% power and a 0.07 significance level to predict the difference between the null hypothesis of 35% PFS6 rate and the alternative hypothesis of 55% PFS6 rate. The protocol specifies a planned interim analysis after the first 21 participants have been accrued. If 12 or more of those participants have died or experienced disease progression/ relapse within 6 months of initiating treatment, accrual will be suspended and the data carefully reviewed before proceeding with additional patient accrual. Participants who are removed from active treatment for toxicity prior to reaching 6 months on treatment are not included in this interim analysis. Participants with recurrent GBM enrolled in the phase I study at the maximum tolerated dose (ie, the phase II dose) are eligible for inclusion in the interim analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
PHASE I Inclusion Criteria (the following modifications to the general eligibility criteria apply to Phase I patients only):
PHASE II Inclusion Criteria (phase II patients must meet the general eligibility criteria as well as the following):
Exclusion criteria
i. Drugs w/ risk of causing TdP = 72 hrs; ii. Warfarin = 7 days.
Other names: panobinostat, Farydak
Other names: Avastin
Time frame: Participants were assessed every 2 weeks while on study; The observation period for MTD evaluation was the first 30 days of treatment.
The MTD LBH589 in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 15 of each 28 day cycle is determined by the number of patients who experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See subsequent primary outcome measure for the DLT definition. The MTD is defined as the highest dose at which fewer than one-third of patients experience a DLT. If no DLTs are observed, the MTD is not reached but the highest dose received may be the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D). The MTD was not reached with 0 of 6 DLTs observed in the highest dose cohort but due to safety concerns higher doses of LBH589 with bevacizumab were neither planned nor tested. The RP2D was 30 mg/day orally, 3x per week, every other week.
Time frame: Participants were assessed every 2 weeks while on study; The observation period for DLT evaluation was the first 30 days of treatment.
A DLT was defined as an adverse event that (a) is related to the LBH589 and/or bevacizumab with an attribution of possible, probable, or definite, and (b) occurs during and/or begins during the first 30 days of the study treatment, and (c) meets any of the following criteria: grade 3 thrombocytopenia; grade 4 neutropenia lasting 7 days; grade 4 anemia lasting 7 days despite transfusion or growth factors; febrile neutropenia if ANC<0.5 x10^9/L; a QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) of 500-515 msec that did not stabilize to <480 msec after one week; a second occurrence of QTc 500-515 msec; any QTc >515 msec; any deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) while on fully therapeutic anticoagulation therapy; Grade 3 proteinuria lasting 14 days; or any other clinically significant Grade 3 toxicity despite maximal medical therapy lasting 7 days, any Grade 4 toxicity despite maximal medical therapy; or any Grade 3 or 4 toxicity resulting in study drug discontinuation.
Time frame: Disease was assessed radiographically to document clinical progression every cycle on treatment and post-treatment every 8 weeks up to 12 months. Participants were followed for PFS6 up to 6 months since study entry.
PFS6 is the proportion of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 6-months from study entry. Progressive disease was established based on RANO criteria (Wen et al JCO 2010).
Time frame: Disease was assessed radiographically for response every cycle on treatment. Treatment duration in cycles was a median (range) of 2 (1-6) PI Cohort 1, 4.5 (2-6) PI Cohort 2, 6 (2-10) PI Cohort 3, 5 PII GBM and 7 PII AG.
Radiographic response was established based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (Wen et al JCO 2010) with 5 potential categories: Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressive disease (PD) and Unknown status.
Time frame: Disease was assessed radiographically to document clinical progression every cycle on treatment and post-treatment every 8 weeks up to 12 months.
PFS is defined as the time from study entry to the earliest documentation of disease progression or death. Patients alive without evidence of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment.
Time frame: Participants were followed long-term for survival every 4 months from the end of treatment until death or lost to follow-up. Phase II participants were followed for OS up to 27 months on this study.
OS is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.
Time frame: Disease was assessed radiographically to document clinical progression every cycle on treatment and post-treatment every 8 weeks up to 12 months.
PFS is defined as the time from study entry to the earliest documentation of disease progression or death. Patients alive without evidence of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment. Progressive disease was established based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (Wen et al JCO 2010).
Time frame: Disease was assessed radiographically to document clinical progression every cycle on treatment and post-treatment every 8 weeks up to 12 months. Participants were followed for PFS6 up to 6 months since study entry.
PFS6 is the proportion of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 6-months from study entry. Progressive disease was established based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (Wen et al JCO 2010).
Time frame: Participants were followed long-term for survival every 4 months from the end of treatment until death or lost to follow-up. Phase I participants were followed for OS up to 12.1 months on this study.
OS is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.
Patrick Y. Wen, MD
Other
Phase I/II Study of LBH589 and Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent High Grade Glioma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02303678
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03213678
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Ann Arbor Stage III Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04817254
Astrocytoma, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03746080
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details